Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37029779›Full record

SynthesisDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2024

Treatment options for gastrointestinal bleeding blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome: Systematic review.

Alessandro Rimondi, Andrea Sorge, Alberto Murino, Nicoletta Nandi, Lucia Scaramella, Maurizio Vecchi, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Luca Elli

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Blue rubber blister nevus syndrome: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alessandro RimondiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0222-7706
Andrea SorgeDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alberto MurinoRoyal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK.
Nicoletta NandiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Lucia ScaramellaGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio VecchiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gian Eugenio TontiniDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luca ElliGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-0759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBlue rubber bleb nevus syndrome (BRBNS) is a rare challenging cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. We performed a systematic review of case reports and case series on BRBNS to gather information on the treatment options currently available.

methodsAll studies reporting a case of BRBNS in humans were evaluated. Papers were ruled out if CARE criteria and explanations on patient's selection, ascertainment, causality, and reporting were not respected or identified. PROSPERO 2021 CRD 42021286982.

resultsBlue rubber bleb nevus syndrome was treated in 106 cases from 76 reports. 57.5% of the population was under 18 years old, and up to 50% of the cases reported a previous treatment. Clinical success was achieved in 98 patients (92.4%). Three main types of interventions were identified: systemic drug therapy, endoscopy, and surgery. After BRBNS recurrence or previous therapy failure, systemic drug therapy emerged as a preferred second-line treatment over endoscopy (P = 0.01), but with a higher rate of reported adverse events when compared with surgery and endoscopy (P < 0.001). Endoscopic treatment was associated with a higher number of required sessions to achieve complete eradication when compared with surgery (P < 0.001). No differences between the three main areas were found in the overall follow-up time (P = 0.19) or in the recurrence rate (P = 0.45).

conclusionEndoscopy, surgery, and systemic drug therapy are feasible treatment options for BRBNS. Systemic drug therapy was the favorite second-line treatment after endoscopic failure or recurrence of BRBNS, but adverse events were more frequently reported.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsNevus, BlueSkin NeoplasmsGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansSyndromeendoscopyenteroscopysmall bowelvascular malformation

Identifiers

PMID37029779
PMCPMC12136259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.