ReviewExperimental physiology2024
Sensorimotor control in the congenital absence of functional muscle spindles.
Review in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the proprioceptive potential of joint receptors using a biomimetic robotic joint.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Shaping the Action Potential in Dorsal Root and Trigeminal Ganglia Neurons: Relevance to Pain Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Listen to your feet.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Measuring position sense.Experimental physiology · 2025Review
- Sensorimotor control in the congenital absence of functional muscle spindles.Experimental physiology · 2024Review
- Experimental Physiology special issue: 'Mechanotransduction, muscle spindles and proprioception'.Experimental physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type III (HSAN III), also known as familial dysautonomia or Riley-Day syndrome, results from an autosomal recessive genetic mutation that causes a selective loss of specific sensory neurones, leading to greatly elevated pain and temperature thresholds, poor proprioception, marked ataxia and disturbances in blood pressure control. Stretch reflexes are absent throughout the body, which can be explained by the absence of functional muscle spindle afferents - assessed by intraneural microelectrodes inserted into peripheral nerves in the upper and lower limbs. This also explains the greatly compromised proprioception at the knee joint, as assessed by passive joint-angle matching. Moreover, there is a tight correlation between loss of proprioceptive acuity at the knee and the severity of gait impairment. Surprisingly, proprioception is normal at the elbow, suggesting that participants are relying more on sensory cues from the overlying skin; microelectrode recordings have shown that myelinated tactile afferents in the upper and lower limbs appear to be normal. Nevertheless, the lack of muscle spindles does affect sensorimotor control in the upper limb: in addition to poor performance in the finger-to-nose test, manual performance in the Purdue pegboard task is much worse than in age-matched healthy controls. Unlike those rare individuals with large-fibre sensory neuropathy, in which both muscle spindle and cutaneous afferents are absent, those with HSAN III present as a means of assessing sensorimotor control following the selective loss of muscle spindle afferents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.