Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37029504›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2023

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial use in companion animals in an academic veterinary hospital in North Carolina.

Ashlan Jolley, William Love, Erin Frey, Cristina Lanzas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashlan JolleyDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, NC State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9373-9298
William LoveDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, NC State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Erin FreyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, NC State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Cristina LanzasDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, NC State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research Training ProgramT35OD011070 · OD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Ronald Hak Long Li · 2012 to 2026
$1.1M
Automated Data Collection on Antimicrobial Use in Dogs and Cats in a Tertiary Hospital and Private PracticesU01FD007057 · FDA · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI LANZAS, CRISTINA · 2020 to 2024
$1000k
FDA HHS U01 FD007057NIH HHS T35 OD011070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial pathogens reduces the effectiveness of these drugs in both human and veterinary medicine, making judicious antimicrobial use (AMU) an important strategy for its control. The COVID-19 pandemic modified operations in both human and veterinary healthcare delivery, potentially impacting AMU. The goal of this research is to quantify how antimicrobial drug prescribing practices for companion animals in an academic veterinary hospital changed during the pandemic. A retrospective study was performed using prescribing data for dogs and cats collected from the NC State College of Veterinary Medicine (NCSU-CVM) pharmacy, which included prescriptions from both the specialty referral hospital and primary care services. Records (n = 31,769) for 34 antimicrobial drugs from 2019-2020-before and during the pandemic-related measures at the NCSU-CVM-were compared. The prescribed antimicrobials' importance was categorized using the FDA's Guidance for Industry (GFI #152), classifying drugs according to medical importance in humans. A proportional odds model was used to estimate the probability of more important antimicrobials being administered in patients seen during the pandemic versus before (i.e., critically important vs. highly important vs. important). Rates of AMU per week and per patient visit were also compared. During the pandemic, cumulative antimicrobials prescribed per week were significantly decreased in most services for dogs. Weekly rates for Highly Important antimicrobials were also significantly lower in dogs. For important and critically important antimicrobials, rates per week were significantly decreased in various services overall. Rates of antimicrobial administration per patient visit were significantly increased for Highly Important drugs. Patients in the internal medicine, dermatology, and surgery services received significantly more important antimicrobials during the pandemic than before, while cardiology patients received significantly less. These results suggest that the pandemic significantly impacted prescribing practices of antimicrobials for companion animals in this study.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCat DiseasesCOVID-19Dog DiseasesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatsDogsHospitals, AnimalHumansNorth CarolinaPandemicsPetsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial usecompanion animalsCOVID-19pandemic

Identifiers

PMID37029504
PMCPMC10330401
OpenAlexW4362717019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.