Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37029319›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Divalent nanobodies to platelet CLEC-2 can serve as agonists or antagonists.

Joanne C Clark, Eleyna M Martin, Luis A Morán, Ying Di, Xueqing Wang, Malou Zuidscherwoude, Helena C Brown, Deirdre M Kavanagh, Johan Hummert, Johannes A Eble and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Joanne C Clark *Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. j.clark.5@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1912-7816
Eleyna M Martin *Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Luis A Morán *Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Ying DiInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Xueqing WangInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Malou ZuidscherwoudeInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Helena C BrownInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7794-151X
Deirdre M KavanaghDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 QU3, UK.
Johan HummertInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Johannes A EbleInstitute for Physiological Chemistry & Pathobiochemistry, University of Münster, Waldeyerstraße 15, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9156-2137
Bernhard NieswandtInstitute of Experimental Biomedicine I, University Hospital and Rudolf Virchow Center for Integrative and Translational Bioimaging, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1454-7413
David StegnerInstitute of Experimental Biomedicine I, University Hospital and Rudolf Virchow Center for Integrative and Translational Bioimaging, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1059-9865
Alice Y PollittInstitute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK.
Dirk-Peter HertenInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3884-0262
Michael G TomlinsonCentre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), The Universities of Birmingham and Nottingham, The Midlands, UK.
Angel GarcíaCentre for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Steve P WatsonInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Level 1 IBR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. S.P.Watson@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7846-7423
University of Birmingham · GBUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity of Würzburg · DEWest Midlands Deanery · GBUniversity of Münster · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation AA/18/2/34218British Heart Foundation RG/13/18/30563Wellcome Trust 204951/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 204951/Z/16Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CLEC-2 is a target for a new class of antiplatelet agent. Clustering of CLEC-2 leads to phosphorylation of a cytosolic YxxL and binding of the tandem SH2 domains in Syk, crosslinking two receptors. We have raised 48 nanobodies to CLEC-2 and crosslinked the most potent of these to generate divalent and tetravalent nanobody ligands. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) was used to show that the multivalent nanobodies cluster CLEC-2 in the membrane and that clustering is reduced by inhibition of Syk. Strikingly, the tetravalent nanobody stimulated aggregation of human platelets, whereas the divalent nanobody was an antagonist. In contrast, in human CLEC-2 knock-in mouse platelets, the divalent nanobody stimulated aggregation. Mouse platelets express a higher level of CLEC-2 than human platelets. In line with this, the divalent nanobody was an agonist in high-expressing transfected DT40 cells and an antagonist in low-expressing cells. FCS, stepwise photobleaching and non-detergent membrane extraction show that CLEC-2 is a mixture of monomers and dimers, with the degree of dimerisation increasing with expression thereby favouring crosslinking of CLEC-2 dimers. These results identify ligand valency, receptor expression/dimerisation and Syk as variables that govern activation of CLEC-2 and suggest that divalent ligands should be considered as partial agonists.

Indexed as

Lectins, C-TypeSingle-Domain AntibodiesAnimalsHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceSignal TransductionSyk KinaseCLEC2B protein, humanCLEC-2 protein, mouseLectins, C-TypeMembrane GlycoproteinsSingle-Domain AntibodiesSyk Kinase

Identifiers

PMID37029319
PMCPMC10082178
OpenAlexW4362698008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.