ArticleEJNMMI research2023
Safety, biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [
Article in EJNMMI research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of a single-day protocol for SPECT and PET assessment of dopamine transporter availability, cardiac innervation and metabolic patterns in patients with movement disorders.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background[
methods8 Chinese healthy volunteers (HVs) received a single 111 MBq ± 10% dose of [
resultsThere were strong similarities in uptake and biodistribution between the Chinese and European studies. Excretion was primarily renal, and the values were similar for the first 5 h but diverged after that, possibly because of differences in subjects' height and weight. Tracer uptake in regions of interest in the brain was stable over the imaging window of 3 to 6 h. The difference in mean effective dose for Chinese HVs vs European HVs (0.028 ± 0.00448 vs 0.023 ± 0.00152 mSv/MBq) was not clinically significant. The [
conclusionThis study demonstrated that a single 111 MBq ± 10% dose of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.