ArticlePediatric research2023
The prognosis of citrin deficiency differs between early-identified newborn and later-onset symptomatic infants.
Article in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing an explainable machine learning model to predict false-negative citrin deficiency cases in newborn screening.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Metabolic signatures and a diagnostic model for citrin deficiency based on urinary organic acids.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term follow-up of neurocognitive function in patients with citrin deficiency and cholestasis.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2025Article
- Enhancing newborn screening sensitivity and specificity for missed NICCD using selected amino acids and acylcarnitines.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognosis for patients with citrin deficiency is not always benign. This study examined the differences between patients identified early by newborn screening and patients identified later with cholestasis/hepatitis. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 42 patients with genetically confirmed SLC25A13 mutations who were born between May 1996 and August 2019. Fifteen patients were identified during newborn screening (NBS group) and 27 patients were identified through the onset of cholestasis/hepatitis in infancy (clinical group).
resultsOverall, 90% of the patients presented with cholestasis, among whom 86% (31/36) recovered at a median age of 174 days. Compared with patients in the clinical group, patients in the NBS group were significantly younger at diagnosis and at cholestasis-free achievement; they also had significantly lower levels of peak direct bilirubin and liver enzymes. At the median follow-up age of 11.8 years, 21% of the patients had dyslipidemia, whereas 36% of the patients had failure to thrive. The overall mortality rate was 2.4%. Variant c.851_854del was the most frequent, constituting 44% of the mutant alleles.
conclusionPatients identified early by NBS had a better prognosis, demonstrating the importance of a timely diagnosis of NICCD and the need for careful follow-up. IMPACT: Some cases of neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency (NICCD) are not benign. Compared with patients identified later based on the presence of cholestasis/hepatitis, patients identified early by newborn screening have less severe cholestasis and are cholestasis-free at a significantly younger age. A timely diagnosis is needed, along with follow-up examinations that assess metabolic profile and body weight, to improve the long-term prognosis of NICCD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.