Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37029221›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Application of machine learning algorithm in predicting distant metastasis of T1 gastric cancer.

HuaKai Tian, Zitao Liu, Jiang Liu, Zhen Zong, YanMei Chen, Zuo Zhang, Hui Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Prediction of hemorrhage rate after tonsil surgery in children based on random forest model].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

HuaKai Tian *Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zitao Liu *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jiang LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zhen ZongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
YanMei ChenDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zuo ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 1 MinDe Road, Nanchang, 330006, China. 1475491732@qq.com.
Hui LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China. lihui0791nc@126.com.
Nanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distant metastasis (DM) is relatively uncommon in T1 stage gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for DM in stage T1 GC using machine learning (ML) algorithms. Patients with stage T1 GC from 2010 to 2017 were screened from the public Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Meanwhile, we collected patients with stage T1 GC admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from 2015 to 2017. We applied seven ML algorithms: logistic regression, random forest (RF), LASSO, support vector machine, k-Nearest Neighbor, Naive Bayesian Model, Artificial Neural Network. Finally, a RF model for DM of T1 GC was developed. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score and accuracy were used to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of the RF model with other models. Finally, we performed a prognostic analysis of patients who developed distant metastases. Independent risk factors for prognosis were analysed by univariate and multifactorial regression. K-M curves were used to express differences in survival prognosis for each variable and subvariable. A total of 2698 cases were included in the SEER dataset, 314 with DM, and 107 hospital patients were included, 14 with DM. Age, T-stage, N-stage, tumour size, grade and tumour location were independent risk factors for the development of DM in stage T1 GC. A combined analysis of seven ML algorithms in the training and test sets found that the RF prediction model had the best prediction performance (AUC: 0.941, Accuracy: 0.917, Recall: 0.841, Specificity: 0.927, F1-score: 0.877). The external validation set ROCAUC was 0.750. Meanwhile, survival prognostic analysis showed that surgery (HR = 3.620, 95% CI 2.164-6.065) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 2.637, 95% CI 2.067-3.365) were independent risk factors for survival prognosis in patients with DM from stage T1 GC. Age, T-stage, N-stage, tumour size, grade and tumour location were independent risk factors for the development of DM in stage T1 GC. ML algorithms had shown that RF prediction models had the best predictive efficacy to accurately screen at-risk populations for further clinical screening for metastases. At the same time, aggressive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the survival rate of patients with DM.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID37029221
PMCPMC10082185
OpenAlexW4362706037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.