ArticleScientific reports2023
Rapid detection of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation status in glioma based on Crispr-Cas12a.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR diagnostics: from trans-nuclease activity to cancer diagnosis.Cell & bioscience · 2026Review
- Precision Neuro-Oncology in Glioblastoma: AI-Guided CRISPR Editing and Real-Time Multi-Omics for Genomic Brain Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligent-Enhanced Metabolite Profiling for Intraoperative IDH1 Genotyping in Glioma Using an Orthogonally Responsive SERS Probe.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Ultra-rapid droplet digital PCR enables intraoperative tumor quantification.Med (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Integrating Radiogenomics and Machine Learning in Musculoskeletal Oncology Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas-Based Prenatal Screening for Aneuploidy: Challenges and Opportunities for Early Diagnosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Review
- Ultra-Rapid Droplet Digital PCR Enables Intraoperative Tumor Quantification.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim is to use Crispr-Cas12a for the rapid detection of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1)-R132H locus and explore the effectiveness and consistency of this method with direct sequencing method for detecting IDH1-R132H of glioma tissue samples. 58 previous frozen tissue and 46 recent fresh tissue samples of adult diffuse glioma were selected to detect IDH1-R132H using Crispr-Cas12a. The results of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and direct sequencing methods were analyzed. We calculated the efficiency index of Crispr-Cas12a and IHC, and analyzed the consistency among Crispr-Cas12a, IHC and direct sequencing method using paired Chi-sequare test and Kappa identity test. We accomplished the rapid detection of IDH1-R132H in 60 min using Crispr-Cas12a. Regarding direct sequencing method as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate of Crispr-Cas12a was 91.4%, 95.7% and 93.1% in the frozen sample group, while 96.1%, 89.7% and 92.0% in the fresh sample group, respectively. Kappa test showed good consistency between the two methods (k = 0.858). Crispr-Cas12a can quickly and accurately detect IDH1-R132H and has good stability. It is a promising method to detect IDH1 mutation status intraoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.