Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37029169›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Localization of spleen and kidney organs from CT scans based on classification of slices in rotational views.

Tomasz Les, Tomasz Markiewicz, Miroslaw Dziekiewicz, Jaime Gallego, Zaneta Swiderska-Chadaj, Malgorzata Lorent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Insertion Network for Image Sequence Correspondence Building.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomasz LesUniversity of Technology, Plac Politechniki 1, 00-661, Warsaw, Poland. tomasz.les@pw.edu.pl.
Tomasz MarkiewiczUniversity of Technology, Plac Politechniki 1, 00-661, Warsaw, Poland.
Miroslaw DziekiewiczMilitary Institute of Medicine, Szaserów 128, 04-141, Warsaw, Poland.
Jaime GallegoUniversity of Barcelona, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Zaneta Swiderska-ChadajUniversity of Technology, Plac Politechniki 1, 00-661, Warsaw, Poland.
Malgorzata LorentMilitary Institute of Medicine, Szaserów 128, 04-141, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a novel multiple organ localization and tracking technique applied to spleen and kidney regions in computed tomography images. The proposed solution is based on a unique approach to classify regions in different spatial projections (e.g., side projection) using convolutional neural networks. Our procedure merges classification results from different projection resulting in a 3D segmentation. The proposed system is able to recognize the contour of the organ with an accuracy of 88-89% depending on the body organ. Research has shown that the use of a single method can be useful for the detection of different organs: kidney and spleen. Our solution can compete with U-Net based solutions in terms of hardware requirements, as it has significantly lower demands. Additionally, it gives better results in small data sets. Another advantage of our solution is a significantly lower training time on an equally sized data set and more capabilities to parallelize calculations. The proposed system enables visualization, localization and tracking of organs and is therefore a valuable tool in medical diagnostic problems.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalSpleenAbdomenImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidneyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37029169
PMCPMC10082200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.