ArticleScientific reports2023
Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy in age-related macular degeneration with submacular hemorrhage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for submacular haemorrhage: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of controversies-On behalf of the Spanish Vitreo-Retinal Society (SERV).Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Pooled it
- Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for posterior segment diseases: Progress, challenges, and the road ahead.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Visual and Anatomic Outcomes of Faricimab in Naïve Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Subretinal Hemorrhage: A Multi-Centre Retrospective Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Poor long-term fellow-eye outcomes after vitrectomy with subretinal tissue plasminogen activator for AMD-related submacular hemorrhage.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Comparison Between Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Monotherapy and Vitrectomy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Large Submacular Hemorrhages.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Management of large submacular hemorrhage in a patient undergoing neurosurgical intervention for moyamoya.Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 1-year visual outcomes of patients treated with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) or brolucizumab (IVBr) for submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We retrospectively studied 62 treatment-naïve eyes with SMHs exceeding one disc area (DA) secondary to AMD treated with IVA or IVBr. All patients received three monthly intravitreal injections in the loading phase followed by as-needed injections or fixed dosing. If a vitreous hemorrhage (VH) developed during the follow-up period, injections were discontinued and vitrectomy was performed. We evaluated the changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and factors that affected the BCVA improvement and VH development. A VH during treatment developed in five eyes (8.1%) (VH + group), and the mean BCVA worsened from 0.45 to 0.92. The BCVA improved significantly (P = 0.040) in the remaining 57 eyes (VH - group) from 0.42 to 0.36. The development of VHs was associated with significantly (P < 0.001) less VA improvement. Furthermore, large DAs and younger age at baseline were associated significantly (P = 0.010 and 0.046, respectively) with the development of VHs. Both IVA and IVBr appeared to improve functional outcomes in patients with SMH secondary to AMD when VHs did not develop. However, a VH developed in 8.1% of eyes after treatment. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments were well-tolerated, for cases with large SMH at baseline, it should be considered that VH may occur during the monotherapy treatment process using IVA or IVBr, and that achieving good visual outcomes may be difficult in some cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.