Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37029138›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2023

Identifying breast cancer patients at risk of relapse despite pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy.

Jens Huober, Marion van Mackelenbergh, Andreas Schneeweiss, Fenja Seither, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Carsten Denkert, Hans Tesch, Claus Hanusch, Christoph Salat, Kerstin Rhiem and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Structural variant and nucleosome occupancy dynamics postchemotherapy in a HER2+ breast cancer organoid model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Jens Huober *Universitätsfrauenklinik Ulm, Brustzentrum, Germany.
Marion van Mackelenbergh *Brustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. marion.vanmackelenbergh@gbg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1084-5897
Andreas SchneeweissNationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fenja SeitherGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Jens-Uwe BlohmerGynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Carsten DenkertInstitut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2249-0982
Hans TeschCentrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Claus HanuschKlinikum zum Roten Kreuz München, München, Germany.
Christoph SalatHämatologisch-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Salat/Stötzer, München, Germany.
Kerstin RhiemZentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany.
Christine SolbachUniversitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Peter A FaschingUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-8471
Christian JackischSana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-3743
Mattea ReinischEvang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1381-8595
Bianca LedererGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Keyur MehtaGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Theresa LinkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Valentina NekljudovaGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany. sibylle.loibl@gbg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6488-4958
Michael UntchHELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany.
German Breast group · DECardiovascular Center Bethanien · DECentrum für Integrierte Onkologie · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHKliniken Essen-Mitte · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DERotkreuzklinikum München · DESana Klinikum Offenbach · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective pooled analysis aims to identify factors predicting relapse despite a pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer (BC). 2066 patients with a pCR from five neoadjuvant GBG/AGO-B trials fulfill the inclusion criteria of this analysis. Primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints is distant DFS (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). After a median follow-up of 57.6 months, DFS is significantly worse for patients with positive lymph nodes (cN+ vs cN0 hazard ratio [HR] 1.94, 95%CI 1.48-2.54; p < 0.001). In patients with triple-negative tumors, lobular histology (lobular vs other HR 3.55, 95%CI 1.53-8.23; p = 0.003), and clinical nodal involvement (cN+ vs cN0 HR 2.45, 95%CI 1.59-3.79; p < 0.001) predict a higher risk of DFS events. Patients with HER2-positive cT3/4 tumors have a significantly higher risk of relapse (cT3/4 vs cT1 HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.06-4.03; p = 0.033). Initial tumor load and histological type predict relapse in patients with a pCR.

Identifiers

PMID37029138
PMCPMC10082019
OpenAlexW4362705930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.