Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37029120›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

No carbon storage in growth-limited trees in a semi-arid woodland.

R Alexander Thompson, Henry D Adams, David D Breshears, Adam D Collins, L Turin Dickman, Charlotte Grossiord, Àngela Manrique-Alba, Drew M Peltier, Michael G Ryan, Amy M Trowbridge and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R Alexander ThompsonSchool of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. robert.a.thompson@wsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5761-1038
Henry D AdamsSchool of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
David D BreshearsSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Adam D CollinsLos Alamos National Laboratory, Earth & Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
L Turin DickmanLos Alamos National Laboratory, Earth & Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3876-7058
Charlotte GrossiordPlant Ecology Research Laboratory PERL, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, EPFL, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Àngela Manrique-AlbaEstación Experimental Aula Dei (EEAD-CSIC), Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7255-4999
Drew M PeltierCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3271-9055
Michael G RyanDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2500-6738
Amy M TrowbridgeDepartment of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Nate G McDowellAtmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Lab, PO Box 999, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant survival depends on a balance between carbon supply and demand. When carbon supply becomes limited, plants buffer demand by using stored carbohydrates (sugar and starch). During drought, NSCs (non-structural carbohydrates) may accumulate if growth stops before photosynthesis. This expectation is pervasive, yet few studies have combined simultaneous measurements of drought, photosynthesis, growth, and carbon storage to test this. Using a field experiment with mature trees in a semi-arid woodland, we show that growth and photosynthesis slow in parallel as [Formula: see text] declines, preventing carbon storage in two species of conifer (J. monosperma and P. edulis). During experimental drought, growth and photosynthesis were frequently co-limited. Our results point to an alternative perspective on how plants use carbon that views growth and photosynthesis as independent processes both regulated by water availability.

Indexed as

ForestsTreesCarbohydratesDroughtsPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesStarchWaterCarbohydratesStarchWater

Identifiers

PMID37029120
PMCPMC10081995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.