ArticleThe Journal of hand surgery2023
Disparities in Treatment of Closed Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 18-64 Years and ≥65 Years by Insurance Type.
Article in The Journal of hand surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Timely Presentation and Treatment in Pediatric Hand Fractures.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- The Impact of Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Insurance on Delays in Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Association Between Health Literacy and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Distal Radius Fracture.The Journal of hand surgery · 2026Article
- Association Between Insurance Status and Recommendation for Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Public Insurance and Language Preferences Are Associated With a Longer Time to Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures.The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2025Article
- Impact of Race and Social Determinants on Operative Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Medicare Patients.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Medicare Eligibility and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Operative Fixation for Distal Radius Fracture.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Does Time to Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures Impact Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes? A Systematic Literature Review.Current orthopaedic practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeType of and time to definitive treatment for distal radius fractures can influence the outcomes. The impact of social determinants of health (eg, insurance type) on distal radius fracture care remains unknown despite having health equity implications. Thus, we evaluate the association between insurance type and rate of surgery, the time to surgery, and the complication rate for distal radius fractures.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the PearlDiver Database. We identified adults with closed distal radius fractures. Patients were divided into subgroups by age (18-64 years, 65+ years) and further stratified on the basis of the insurance type (Medicare Advantage, Medicaid-managed care, and commercial). The primary outcome was the rate of surgical fixation. Secondary outcomes included the time to surgery and 12-month complication rates. Logistic regression modeling was used to calculate the odds ratios for each outcome, adjusting for age, sex, geographic region, and comorbidities.
resultsIn patients aged ≥65 years, a lower proportion of Medicaid patients underwent surgery within 21 days of diagnosis compared with Medicare or commercially insured patients (12.1% vs 15.9% or 17.5%, respectively). Complication rates did not differ between Medicaid and other insurance types. In patients aged <65 years, fewer Medicaid patients underwent surgery compared with commercially insured patients (16.2% vs 21.1%). However, in this younger group, Medicaid patients had higher adjusted odds of malunion/nonunion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.39 [95% CI, 1.31-1.47]) and subsequent repair (aOR = 1.38 [95% CI, 1.25-1.53]). DISCUSSION: Although older Medicaid patients experienced lower surgical rates, this may not lead to differential clinical outcomes. However, Medicaid patients aged <65 years experienced lower surgical rates that correlated with the increased rates of malunion or nonunion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In younger patients with a closed distal radius fracture and Medicaid insurance, system and patient-directed efforts should be considered to address delayed time to surgery and a higher odds for malunion/nonunion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.