Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37028010›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2023

Automatic 4D Flow MRI Segmentation Using the Standardized Difference of Means Velocity.

Sean M Rothenberger, Neal M Patel, Jiacheng Zhang, Susanne Schnell, Bruce A Craig, Sameer A Ansari, Michael Markl, Pavlos P Vlachos, Vitaliy L Rayz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 4D flow MRI velocity uncertainty quantification.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean M Rothenberger
Neal M Patel
Jiacheng Zhang
Susanne Schnell
Bruce A Craig
Sameer A Ansari
Michael Markl
Pavlos P Vlachos
Vitaliy L Rayz
Purdue University West Lafayette · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Risk Assessment of Cerebral Aneurysm Growth with 4D flow MRIR01HL115267 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANSARI, SAMEER A, LAWTON, MICHAEL T · 2013 to 2023
$4.2M
Indiana Medical Scientist/Engineer Training ProgramT32GM148382 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Benjamin Gaston, Emily K Sims · 2023 to 2026
$3.9M
Predicting Stroke Risk in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease with Novel High Resolution,Functional and Molecular MRI Techniques - Resubmission - 1R01NS114632 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ANSARI, SAMEER A, CARROLL, TIMOTHY J · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
Non-invasive Evaluation of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease Using Hemodynamic BiomarkersR01HL149787 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ANSARI, SAMEER A, MARKL, MICHAEL · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
Multi-modality 4D Flow MRI data enhancement for quantification of cerebral aneurysms hemodynamicsR21NS106696 · NINDS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI RAYZ, VITALIY L, SCHNELL, SUSANNE · 2018 to 2019
$419k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115267NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149787NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM148382NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS114632NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS106696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a method to automatically segment 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by identifying net flow effects using the standardized difference of means (SDM) velocity. The SDM velocity quantifies the ratio between the net flow and observed flow pulsatility in each voxel. Vessel segmentation is performed using an F-test, identifying voxels with significantly higher SDM velocity values than background voxels. We compare the SDM segmentation algorithm against pseudo-complex difference (PCD) intensity segmentation of 4D flow measurements in in vitro cerebral aneurysm models and 10 in vitro Circle of Willis (CoW) datasets. We also compared the SDM algorithm to convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentation in 5 thoracic vasculature datasets. The in vitro flow phantom geometry is known, while the ground truth geometries for the CoW and thoracic aortas are derived from high-resolution time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography and manual segmentation, respectively. The SDM algorithm demonstrates greater robustness than PCD and CNN approaches and can be applied to 4D flow data from other vascular territories. The SDM to PCD comparison demonstrated an approximate 48% increase in sensitivity in vitro and 70% increase in the CoW, respectively; the SDM and CNN sensitivities were similar. The vessel surface derived from the SDM method was 46% closer to the in vitro surfaces and 72% closer to the in vitro TOF surfaces than the PCD approach. The SDM and CNN approaches both accurately identify vessel surfaces. The SDM algorithm is a repeatable segmentation method, enabling reliable computation of hemodynamic metrics associated with cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsAorta, ThoracicBlood Flow VelocityHemodynamics

Identifiers

PMID37028010
PMCPMC10474251
OpenAlexW4323022541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.