ArticleRespiratory medicine and research2023
Recovery after admission with COVID-19 pneumonia - A follow-up study.
Article in Respiratory medicine and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Short- and Long-Term Chest-CT Findings after Recovery from COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe performed this study to describe clinical, radiological and pulmonary function outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia 1 year after discharge from hospital.
methodsThis is a prospective longitudinal study on patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia in March and April 2020. 162 patients were classified as moderate, severe or critical. Symptoms and pulmonary function were assessed at 3 months and 1 year after discharge. Chest CT scans were made during hospital admission, at 3 months and, in case of persistent radiological abnormalities, after 1 year.
results54% of patients reported full recovery of their pre-illness fitness after 1 year. 53% still reported exertional dyspnoea, independent of illness severity. DLCOc < 80% after 1 year was found in 74% of critical, 50% of severe and 38% of moderate cases. For KCOc<80%, no between-group difference was found. Restriction (TLC<80%) was found in 28% of critical, 5% of severe, and 13% of moderate cases. At baseline, chest CT score was significantly higher for the critical illness group, but after 1 year, there was no significant difference. Most resolution of abnormalities occurred before 3 months. A high prevalence of fibrotic lesions (24%) and subpleural banding (27%) was found. CONCLUSION/CLINICAL IMPLICATION: A large proportion of patients experience consequences of COVID-19 pneumonia one year after discharge, irrespective of initial disease severity. Follow-up of patients admitted with COVID-19 is therefore warranted. An evaluation of symptoms, pulmonary function and radiology three months after discharge can discriminate between patients with early complete recovery and those with persistent abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.