Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37027834›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2023

Expert Consideration on Regulatory Aspects for Perinatal Derivatives in Clinical Settings.

Nicola Hofmann, Xavier Lafarge, Mariastefania Antica, Nicolas Ferry, Lenart Girandon, Roberto Gramignoli, Marcin Jurga, Halima Kerdjoudj, Ruta Navakauskiene, Jessica Schiavi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cord Blood-Derived Platelet Gel in Wound Healing: From Biological Rationale to Clinical Application.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nicola HofmannGerman Society for Tissue Transplantation (DGFG) gGmbH, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5281-1361
Xavier LafargeEtablissement Français du Sang Nouvelle-Aquitaine Laboratoire d'ingénierie tissulaire et cellulaire, Bordeaux, France.
Mariastefania AnticaRuder Boskovic Institute, Division of Molecular Biology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nicolas FerryINSERM, Department of health technology, Île-de-France, Paris, France.
Lenart GirandonEducell ltd., R&D department, Trzin, Slowenia.
Roberto GramignoliDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcin JurgaEXO Biologics, Niel, Belgium.
Halima KerdjoudjUniversité de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Odontology, EA4691-BIOS, Reims, France.
Ruta NavakauskieneDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Jessica SchiaviCNRS, LRGP, Department of Biomolecules Bioprocess, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Volodymyr ShabliiLaboratory of Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Department of Functional Genomics, National Academy of Science, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Francisco J NicolásLab. Regeneración, Oncología Molecular y TGFß. IMIB-Pascual Parrilla. El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
Florelle GindrauxService de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, Stomatologie et Odontologie Hospitalière, CHU Besancon, Besancon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinatal derivatives (PnD) are drawing growing interest among the scientific community as an unrestricted source of multipotent stem cells, secretome, and biological matrices. They are useful for the treatment of diseases that currently have limited or no effective therapeutic options, but they require the development of regenerative approaches. With this development, the question of regulation of donation, processing, and distribution has therefore become more important. Within the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) community, we compiled a group of international experts on PnD technologies, who revised and compared existing EU national regulations. Notably, despite clear European directives, each EU Country has developed their own implementation and standard levels for cell- and tissue-based therapies. To enable extended applications of PnD treatments within the EU community and worldwide, harmonization is highly recommended. This paper aims to provide an overview of the various options available to introduce PnD into clinical practice. For this purpose, the different aspects resulting from (1) the type of PnD, (2) the amount of available data, (3) the degree of manipulation, and (4) the intended application and the process toward a possible commercialization will be presented. In the future, it will be important to find a balance between regulatory requirements and the best medical quality of the PnD product.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyEuropean UnionATMPcell therapyEuropean regulationperinatal tissuesplacenta

Identifiers

PMID37027834
PMCPMC10184691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.