ArticleIEEE transactions on haptics
Perception of Torque is Impacted by a Subset of Features Related to the Motor Command.
Article in IEEE transactions on haptics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individuals with hemiparetic stroke abnormally perceive their elbow torques when abducting their paretic shoulder.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate perception of one's self-generated torques is integral to sensorimotor control. Here, we examined how features of the motor control task, specifically the variability, duration, muscle activation pattern, and magnitude of torque generation, relate to one's perception of torque. Nineteen participants generated and perceived 25% of their maximum voluntary torque (MVT) in elbow flexion while simultaneously abducting at their shoulder to 10%, 30%, or 50% of their MVT in shoulder abduction (MVT[Formula: see text]). Subsequently, participants matched the elbow torque without feedback and without activating their shoulder. The shoulder abduction magnitude affected the time to stabilize the elbow torque (p 0.001), but did not significantly impact the variability of generating the elbow torque (p = 0.120) or the co-contraction between the elbow flexor and extensor muscles (p = 0.265). The shoulder abduction magnitude influenced perception (p = 0.001) in that the error in matching the elbow torque increased with an increased shoulder abduction torque. However, the torque matching errors neither correlated with the time to stabilize and variability in generating the elbow torque, nor the co-contraction of the elbow muscles. These findings suggest that the total torque generated during a multi-joint task impacts the perception of a torque about a single joint; yet, effective and efficient generation of the torque about a single joint does not impact the torque percept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.