Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37027404›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Accuracy of 3D printed scan bodies for dental implants using two additive manufacturing systems: An in vitro study.

Liam J Hopfensperger, Georgi Talmazov, Rami Ammoun, Christian Brenes, Sompop Bencharit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liam J HopfenspergerDepartment of Oral & Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Philips Institute for Oral Health Research, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Georgi TalmazovPrivate Practice, Washington DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9379-4572
Rami AmmounDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Christian BrenesDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, College of Dental Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Sompop BencharitDepartment of Oral & Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Philips Institute for Oral Health Research, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-9362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the accuracy of implant scan bodies printed using stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) technologies to the control (manufacturer's scan body) Scan bodies were printed using SLA (n = 10) and DLP (n = 10) methods. Ten manufacturer's scan bodies were used as control. The scan body was placed onto a simulated 3D printed cast with a single implant placed. An implant fixture mount was used as standard. The implant positions were scanned using a laboratory scanner with the fixture mounts, manufacturer's scan bodies, and the printed scan bodies. The scans of each scan body was then superimposed onto the referenced fixture mount. The 3D angulation and linear deviations were measured. The angulation and linear deviations were 1.24±0.22° and 0.20±0.05 mm; 2.63±0.82° and 0.34±0.11 mm; 1.79±0.19° and 0.32±0.03 mm; for the control, SLA, and DLP, respectively. There were statistical differences (ANOVA) among the three groups in the angular (p<0.01) or linear deviations (p<0.01). Box plotting, 95% confidence interval and F-test suggested the higher variations of precision in the SLA group compared to DLP and control groups. Scan bodies printed in-office have lower accuracy compared to the manufacturer's scan bodies. The current technology for 3D printing of implant scan bodies needs trueness and precision improvements.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsSurgery, Computer-AssistedComputer-Aided DesignPrinting, Three-DimensionalStereolithographyDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID37027404
PMCPMC10081781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.