Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37027365›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on internet gaming disorder among general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lovin Gopali, Rolina Dhital, Rachita Koirala, Trijya Shrestha, Sandesh Bhusal, Reshika Rimal, Carmina Shrestha, Richa Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Internet Gaming Disorder - An Emerging Digital Epidemic: Exploratory Analysis of Prevalence and Correlates among Young Adults of Tamil Nadu.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lovin GopaliHealth Action and Research, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0787-2656
Rolina DhitalHealth Action and Research, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9491-2881
Rachita KoiralaHealth Action and Research, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Trijya ShresthaHealth Action and Research, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-8229
Sandesh BhusalHealth Action and Research, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-5823
Reshika RimalHealth Action and Research, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-9159
Carmina ShresthaHealth Action and Research, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0056-3009
Richa ShahHealth Action and Research, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3625-8228
Nepal Participatory Action Network · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internet gaming disorder (IGD) has been rising in recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a noticeable shift in the way people interact with technology, which could have further contributed to an increase in IGD. Post-pandemic, the concern for IGD is likely to continue as people have become increasingly reliant on online activities. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence of IGD among the general population globally during the pandemic. Relevant studies that assessed IGD during COVID-19 were identified using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycNET between 2020, Jan 1 and 2022, May 23. We used NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies to assess the risk of bias, and GRADEpro for the certainty of the evidence. Three separate meta-analyses were performed using Comprehensive meta-analysis software and Revman 5.4. In total, 362 studies were identified, of which 24 observational (15 cross-sectional and 9 longitudinal) studies among 83,903 population were included in the review, and 9 studies in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias assessment showed an overall fair impression among the studies. The meta-analysis for a single group of 3 studies showed the prevalence rate of 8.00% for IGD. Another meta-analysis of 4 studies for a single group showed a pooled mean of 16.57 which was lower than the cut-off value of the IGDS9-SF tool. The two-group meta-analysis of 2 studies showed no significant difference between the groups before and during COVID-19. Our study showed no clear evidence of increased IGD during COVID-19 due to limited number of comparable studies, substantial heterogeneity, and low certainty of evidence. Further well-designed studies are needed to provide stronger evidence to implement suitable interventions to address IGD worldwide. The protocol was registered and published in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Review (PROSPERO) with the registration number CRD42021282825.

Identifiers

PMID37027365
PMCPMC10081738
OpenAlexW4362692981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.