SynthesisJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2023
Tantalum Cementless Versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Level 1 Studies.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two-Peg Cementless Trabecular Metal Modular Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Study with Cemented Counterparts.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- CORR Insights®: What Is the Survivorship of TKA With a Twin-peg or Spikes-and-keel Cementless Implant Compared With Cemented? A Registry-based Cohort Study.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Trend of using cementless total knee arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis from 2015 to 2021.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionControversy exists on the ideal type of fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Noncemented fixation has been theorized to improve patient outcomes and longevity of implantation without increased risk of aseptic loosening or radiolucent lines. We sought to compare (1) patient-reported outcomes, (2) survivorship, and (3) revision rates for all-cause and aseptic loosening in a noncemented tantalum total knee with its cemented counterpart.
methodsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines were searched using a combination of keywords "trabecular metal," "tantalum knee," "total knee arthroplasty," and "cementless trabecular." Patient demographics such as age, sex, and body mass index were collected. Outcomes such as Knee Society Scores (KSSs), revisions, and radiolucent lines were recorded for analysis.
resultsFour randomized controlled trials involving 507 patients with an average 5-year follow-up were eligible for meta-analysis. No differences were observed in any demographics such as age, sex, body mass index, nor preoperative KSS. Patients in the cemented cohort improved from preoperative KSS 46.4 to postoperative KSS 90.4 while the tantalum cohort improved from 46.4 to 89.3. No statistical difference was observed in postoperative KSS mean difference between groups. Six patients from the tantalum group underwent revision with one patient for aseptic loosening. Twelve patients from the cemented group underwent revision with four patients for aseptic loosening. No statistical difference was observed between rates of revision, aseptic loosening, or radiolucent line development. DISCUSSION: Patient-reported outcomes improved postoperatively in both groups. No differences were detected between the cemented and noncemented TKAs in patient-reported outcomes, revision rates, or radiolucent line development. Noncemented tantalum fixation seems equivalent to cemented TKA survivorship. Longer term follow-up of these randomized controlled trials may provide a clearer understanding whether a difference exists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.