Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37027213›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2023

A predictive model for lung cancer screening nonadherence in a community setting health-care network.

Mehrad Bastani, Codruta Chiuzan, Gerard Silvestri, Suhail Raoof, Jesse Chusid, Michael Diefenbach, Stuart L Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehrad BastaniDepartment of Radiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9571-9488
Codruta ChiuzanFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Gerard SilvestriDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Suhail RaoofDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Jesse ChusidDepartment of Radiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Michael DiefenbachFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2821-1507
Stuart L CohenDepartment of Radiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.

Funding

Personalized screening for lung cancer: the importance of co-existing chronic conditions to clinical practice and policyR01CA249506 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BRAITHWAITE, DEJANA K, GOULD, MICHAEL K · 2020 to 2025
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer screening (LCS) decreases lung cancer mortality. However, its benefit may be limited by nonadherence to screening. Although factors associated with LCS nonadherence have been identified, to the best of our knowledge, no predictive models have been developed to predict LCS nonadherence. The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model leveraging a machine learning model to predict LCS nonadherence risk.

methodsA retrospective cohort of patients who enrolled in our LCS program between 2015 and 2018 was used to develop a model to predict the risk of nonadherence to annual LCS after the baseline examination. Clinical and demographic data were used to fit logistic regression, random forest, and gradient-boosting models that were internally validated on the basis of accuracy and area under the receiver operating curve.

resultsA total of 1875 individuals with baseline LCS were included in the analysis, with 1264 (67.4%) as nonadherent. Nonadherence was defined on the basis of baseline chest computed tomography (CT) findings. Clinical and demographic predictors were used on the basis of availability and statistical significance. The gradient-boosting model had the highest area under the receiver operating curve (0.89, 95% confidence interval = 0.87 to 0.90), with a mean accuracy of 0.82. Referral specialty, insurance type, and baseline Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (LungRADS) score were the best predictors of nonadherence to LCS.

conclusionsWe developed a machine learning model using readily available clinical and demographic data to predict LCS nonadherence with high accuracy and discrimination. After further prospective validation, this model can be used to identify patients for interventions to improve LCS adherence and decrease lung cancer burden.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37027213
PMCPMC10097452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.