Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37027207›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2023

The Role of Compassionate Technology in Blended and Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Scoping Review.

Charlotte van Lotringen, Benedetta Lusi, Gerben J Westerhof, Geke D S Ludden, Hanneke Kip, Saskia M Kelders, Matthijs L Noordzij

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte van LotringenDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3819-2637
Benedetta LusiDepartment of Design, Production and Management, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8693-5453
Gerben J WesterhofDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0993-1448
Geke D S LuddenDepartment of Design, Production and Management, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4508-9865
Hanneke KipDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6661-2128
Saskia M KeldersDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-6871
Matthijs L NoordzijDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5013-9225
University of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn essential value in mental health care is compassion: awareness of suffering, tolerating difficult feelings in the face of suffering, and acting or being motivated to alleviate suffering. Currently, technologies for mental health care are on the rise and could offer several advantages, such as more options for self-management by clients and more accessible and economically viable care. However, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have not been widely implemented in daily practice. Developing and evaluating DMHIs around important mental health care values, such as compassion, could be key for a better integration of technology in the mental health care context.

objectiveThis systematic scoping review explored the literature for previous instances where technology for mental health care has been linked to compassion or empathy to investigate how DMHIs can support compassion in mental health care.

methodsSearches were conducted in the PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, and screening by 2 reviewers resulted in 33 included articles. From these articles, we extracted the following data: technology types, goals, target groups, and roles of the technologies in the intervention; study designs; outcome measures; and the extent to which the technologies met a 5-step proposed definition of compassion.

resultsWe found 3 main ways in which technology can contribute to compassion in mental health care: by showing compassion to people, by enhancing self-compassion in people, or by facilitating compassion between people. However, none of the included technologies met all 5 elements of compassion nor were they evaluated in terms of compassion.

conclusionsWe discuss the potential of compassionate technology, its challenges, and the need to evaluate technology for mental health care on compassion. Our findings could contribute to the development of compassionate technology, in which elements of compassion are explicitly embedded in its design, use, and evaluation.

Indexed as

compassioncompassionate technologydigital mental health interventionseHealthe–mental healthmental health care

Identifiers

PMID37027207
PMCPMC10131870
OpenAlexW4318000223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.