Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37027199›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Digital Health Technologies for Maternal and Child Health in Africa and Other Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Cross-disciplinary Scoping Review With Stakeholder Consultation.

Sarina Till, Mirriam Mkhize, Jaydon Farao, Londiwe Deborah Shandu, Livhuwani Muthelo, Toshka Lauren Coleman, Masenyani Mbombi, Mamara Bopape, Sonja Klingberg, Alastair van Heerden and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sarina TillSchool of Information Technology, Independent Institute of Education, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3281-1484
Mirriam MkhizeHuman Sciences Research Council, Centre for Community Based Research, Sweet Waters, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6416-5395
Jaydon FaraoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7564-954X
Londiwe Deborah ShanduHuman Sciences Research Council, Centre for Community Based Research, Sweet Waters, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4784-9285
Livhuwani MutheloFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5672-1702
Toshka Lauren ColemanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9252-3914
Masenyani MbombiFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0085-5231
Mamara BopapeFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1094-3160
Sonja KlingbergSouth African Medical Research Council/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9330-7102
Alastair van HeerdenHuman Sciences Research Council, Centre for Community Based Research, Sweet Waters, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2530-6885
Tebogo MothibaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8577-9126
Melissa DensmoreDepartment of Computer Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1733-2653
Nervo Xavier Verdezoto DiasDepartment of Computer Science, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5006-4262
CoMaCH NetworkSee Acknowledgments, .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and child health (MCH) is a global health concern, especially impacting low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Digital health technologies are creating opportunities to address the social determinants of MCH by facilitating access to information and providing other forms of support throughout the maternity journey. Previous reviews in different disciplines have synthesized digital health intervention outcomes in LMIC. However, contributions in this space are scattered across publications in different disciplines and lack coherence in what digital MCH means across fields.

objectiveThis cross-disciplinary scoping review synthesized the existing published literature in 3 major disciplines on the use of digital health interventions for MCH in LMIC, with a particular focus on sub-Saharan Africa.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using the 6-stage framework by Arksey and O'Malley across 3 disciplines, including public health, social sciences applied to health, and human-computer interaction research in health care. We searched the following databases: Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, and PLOS. A stakeholder consultation was undertaken to inform and validate the review.

resultsDuring the search, 284 peer-reviewed articles were identified. After removing 41 duplicates, 141 articles met our inclusion criteria: 34 from social sciences applied to health, 58 from public health, and 49 from human-computer interaction research in health care. These articles were then tagged (labeled) by 3 researchers using a custom data extraction framework to obtain the findings. First, the scope of digital MCH was found to target health education (eg, breastfeeding and child nutrition), care and follow-up of health service use (to support community health workers), maternal mental health, and nutritional and health outcomes. These interventions included mobile apps, SMS text messaging, voice messaging, web-based applications, social media, movies and videos, and wearable or sensor-based devices. Second, we highlight key challenges: little attention has been given to understanding the lived experiences of the communities; key role players (eg, fathers, grandparents, and other family members) are often excluded; and many studies are designed considering nuclear families that do not represent the family structures of the local cultures.

conclusionsDigital MCH has shown steady growth in Africa and other LMIC settings. Unfortunately, the role of the community was negligible, as these interventions often do not include communities early and inclusively enough in the design process. We highlight key opportunities and sociotechnical challenges for digital MCH in LMIC, such as more affordable mobile data; better access to smartphones and wearable technologies; and the rise of custom-developed, culturally appropriate apps that are more suited to low-literacy users. We also focus on barriers such as an overreliance on text-based communications and the difficulty of MCH research and design to inform and translate into policy.

Indexed as

Child HealthDeveloping CountriesAfricaChildDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth ServicesHumansPregnancychild healthco-designcommunitydigital healthLMIClow- and middle-income countriesmaternal healthmobile phonescoping reviewtechnology

Identifiers

PMID37027199
PMCPMC10131761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.