Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37027185›Full record

SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2023

Associations Between Social Cognitive Determinants and Movement-Related Behaviors in Studies Using Ecological Momentary Assessment Methods: Systematic Review.

Kelsey M Bittel, Kate Y O'Briant, Rena M Ragaglia, Lake Buseth, Courtney Murtha, Jessica Yu, Jennifer M Stanely, Brynn L Hudgins, Derek J Hevel, Jaclyn P Maher

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Experience sampling method studies in physical activity research: the relevance of causal reasoning.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kelsey M BittelDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0214-8052
Kate Y O'BriantDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0922-9413
Rena M RagagliaDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7156-4933
Lake BusethDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0724-2021
Courtney MurthaDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5138-5922
Jessica YuDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5012-8684
Jennifer M StanelyDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6713-8456
Brynn L HudginsDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5693-5081
Derek J HevelDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-3690
Jaclyn P MaherDepartment of Kinesiology, University Of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1276-4361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe social cognitive framework is a long-standing framework within physical activity promotion literature to explain and predict movement-related behaviors. However, applications of the social cognitive framework to explain and predict movement-related behaviors have typically examined the relationships between determinants and behavior across macrotimescales (eg, weeks and months). There is more recent evidence suggesting that movement-related behaviors and their social cognitive determinants (eg, self-efficacy and intentions) change across microtimescales (eg, hours and days). Therefore, efforts have been devoted to examining the relationship between social cognitive determinants and movement-related behaviors across microtimescales. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a growing methodology that can capture movement-related behaviors and social cognitive determinants as they change across microtimescales.

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review was to summarize evidence from EMA studies examining associations between social cognitive determinants and movement-related behaviors (ie, physical activity and sedentary behavior).

methodsStudies were included if they quantitatively tested such an association at the momentary or day level and excluded if they were an active intervention. Using keyword searches, articles were identified across the PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO databases. Articles were first assessed through abstract and title screening followed by full-text review. Each article was screened independently by 2 reviewers. For eligible articles, data regarding study design, associations between social cognitive determinants and movement-related behaviors, and study quality (ie, Methodological Quality Questionnaire and Checklist for Reporting Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies) were extracted. At least 4 articles were required to draw a conclusion regarding the overall associations between a social cognitive determinant and movement-related behavior. For the social cognitive determinants in which a conclusion regarding an overall association could be drawn, 60% of the articles needed to document a similar association (ie, positive, negative, or null) to conclude that the association existed in a particular direction.

resultsA total of 24 articles including 1891 participants were eligible for the review. At the day level, intentions and self-efficacy were positively associated with physical activity. No other associations could be determined because of conflicting findings or the small number of studies investigating associations.

conclusionsFuture research would benefit from validating EMA assessments of social cognitive determinants and systematically investigating associations across different operationalizations of key constructs. Despite the only recent emergence of EMA to understand social cognitive determinants of movement-related behaviors, the findings indicate that daily intentions and self-efficacy play an important role in regulating physical activity in everyday life.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42022328500; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=328500.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentExerciseCognitionHumansSedentary BehaviorSurveys and Questionnairesambulatory assessmentmobile phonemotivationphysical activitypsychosocialsedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID37027185
PMCPMC10131703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.