ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023
Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Survey on Perspectives Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Italian Interventional Cardiologists.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The current state of artificial intelligence-based invasive coronary angiography image analysis: a systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Angio-fusion net: dual-stream enhanced VGG16 attention U-Net for vessel morphology preservation in XCA segmentation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning models using serum gastric biomarkers for the non-invasive prediction of atrophic gastritis: a comparative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Coronary Arteries and Stenosis Detection in X-Ray Coronary Angiography.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Non-invasive derivation of instantaneous free-wave ratio from invasive coronary angiography using a new deep learning artificial intelligence model and comparison with human operators' performance.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Review
- Old Habits Die Hard: Can AI Help Bring Coronary Angiography Into the 21st Century?JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- How AI and Robotics Will Advance Interventional Radiology: Narrative Review and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Optimizing ensemble U-Net architectures for robust coronary vessel segmentation in angiographic images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- One-Stage Detection without Segmentation for Multi-Type Coronary Lesions in Angiography Images Using Deep Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Editor's choice to the June 2023 issue : Left atrial strain evaluation to assess left ventricle diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a guide to clinical practice.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for automatic coronary angiography (CAG) segmentation, using deep learning. To validate this approach, the model was applied to a new dataset and results are reported.
methodsRetrospective selection of patients undergoing CAG and percutaneous coronary intervention or invasive physiology assessment over a one month period from four centers. A single frame was selected from images containing a lesion with a 50-99% stenosis (visual estimation). Automatic Quantitative Coronary Analysis (QCA) was performed with a validated software. Images were then segmented by the AI model. Lesion diameters, area overlap [based on true positive (TP) and true negative (TN) pixels] and a global segmentation score (GSS - 0 -100 points) - previously developed and published - were measured.
results123 regions of interest from 117 images across 90 patients were included. There were no significant differences between lesion diameter, percentage diameter stenosis and distal border diameter between the original/segmented images. There was a statistically significant albeit minor difference [0,19 mm (0,09-0,28)] regarding proximal border diameter. Overlap accuracy ((TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN)), sensitivity (TP / (TP + FN)) and Dice Score (2TP / (2TP + FN + FP)) between original/segmented images was 99,9%, 95,1% and 94,8%, respectively. The GSS was 92 (87-96), similar to the previously obtained value in the training dataset.
conclusionthe AI model was capable of accurate CAG segmentation across multiple performance metrics, when applied to a multicentric validation dataset. This paves the way for future research on its clinical uses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.