Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37027105›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023

Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model.

Miguel Nobre Menezes, João Lourenço Silva, Beatriz Silva, Tiago Rodrigues, Cláudio Guerreiro, João Pedro Guedes, Manuel Oliveira Santos, Arlindo L Oliveira, Fausto J Pinto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miguel Nobre MenezesStructural and Coronary Heart Disease Unit, Faculdade de Medicina, Cardiovascular Center of the University of Lisbon, Universidade de Lisboa (CCUL@RISE), Av Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal. mnmenezes.gm@gmail.com.
João Lourenço SilvaINESC-ID / Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Beatriz SilvaStructural and Coronary Heart Disease Unit, Faculdade de Medicina, Cardiovascular Center of the University of Lisbon, Universidade de Lisboa (CCUL@RISE), Av Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.
Tiago RodriguesStructural and Coronary Heart Disease Unit, Faculdade de Medicina, Cardiovascular Center of the University of Lisbon, Universidade de Lisboa (CCUL@RISE), Av Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.
Cláudio GuerreiroCentro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto, Portugal.
João Pedro GuedesUnidade de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia de Intervenção, Serviço de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve, Hospital de Faro, Faro, Portugal.
Manuel Oliveira SantosUnidade de Intervenção Cardiovascular, Serviço de Cardiologia do Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, 3004-561, Portugal.
Arlindo L OliveiraINESC-ID / Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Fausto J PintoStructural and Coronary Heart Disease Unit, Faculdade de Medicina, Cardiovascular Center of the University of Lisbon, Universidade de Lisboa (CCUL@RISE), Av Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for automatic coronary angiography (CAG) segmentation, using deep learning. To validate this approach, the model was applied to a new dataset and results are reported.

methodsRetrospective selection of patients undergoing CAG and percutaneous coronary intervention or invasive physiology assessment over a one month period from four centers. A single frame was selected from images containing a lesion with a 50-99% stenosis (visual estimation). Automatic Quantitative Coronary Analysis (QCA) was performed with a validated software. Images were then segmented by the AI model. Lesion diameters, area overlap [based on true positive (TP) and true negative (TN) pixels] and a global segmentation score (GSS - 0 -100 points) - previously developed and published - were measured.

results123 regions of interest from 117 images across 90 patients were included. There were no significant differences between lesion diameter, percentage diameter stenosis and distal border diameter between the original/segmented images. There was a statistically significant albeit minor difference [0,19 mm (0,09-0,28)] regarding proximal border diameter. Overlap accuracy ((TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN)), sensitivity (TP / (TP + FN)) and Dice Score (2TP / (2TP + FN + FP)) between original/segmented images was 99,9%, 95,1% and 94,8%, respectively. The GSS was 92 (87-96), similar to the previously obtained value in the training dataset.

conclusionthe AI model was capable of accurate CAG segmentation across multiple performance metrics, when applied to a multicentric validation dataset. This paves the way for future research on its clinical uses.

Indexed as

Coronary StenosisDeep LearningArtificial IntelligenceConstriction, PathologicCoronary AngiographyHumansPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesX-RaysArtificial IntelligenceCoronary angiographyCoronary artery diseaseDeep learningMachine learningPercutaneous coronary intervention.

Identifiers

PMID37027105
PMCPMC10250252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.