Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37027076›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Missing Data in Sport Science: A Didactic Example Using Wearables in American Football.

Matthew S Tenan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew S TenanRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. matthew.tenan@hsc.wvu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2215-0846
West Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data are often recorded from athletes to make decisions regarding the mitigation of injuries or the enhancement of performance. However, data collection in the real-world is difficult, and it is common for data to be missing from a particular training session due to equipment malfunction, athlete non-compliance, etc. The statistical community has long recognized that proper handling of missing data is vital to unbiased analyses and decision making, yet most dashboards in sport science and medicine do not recognize the issues introduced by missing data and practitioners are largely unaware that their displays are conveying biased information. The goal of this leading article is to show how real-world data can violate the 'missing completely at random' assumption in an American Football example and then demonstrate some potential imputation solutions which appear to maintain the underlying properties of the data in the presence of missingness. Whether data are aggregated on a dashboard as simple histograms and averages or with higher-level analytics, violating the 'missing completely at random' assumption results in a biased dashboard. Practitioners need to insist that dashboard developers perform missing data analyses and impute data as needed so valid data-driven decisions can be made.

Indexed as

FootballWearable Electronic DevicesData AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMotivation

Identifiers

PMID37027076
OpenAlexW4362692694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.