SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2023
A meta-analysis of circulating tumor DNA as a survival indicator in small cell lung cancer patients.
Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Reframing small cell lung cancer: therapeutic lessons from hematologic malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Analysis of the Value of Dynamic Changes in Circulating Tumor DNA in Small Cell Lung Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- The Prognostic Value of FOXL2 Mutant Circulating Tumor DNA in Adult Granulosa Cell Tumor Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- State of the art in treatment of small cell lung cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A high level of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been linked to poor survival in patients with certain solid tumors. In spite of this, it is still unclear whether ctDNA is associated with poor survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). To investigate the above association, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane's Library, and Embase were searched for relevant cohort studies from the inception of the databases to November 28, 2022. Data collection, literature search, and statistical analysis were carried out independently by two authors. To account for heterogeneity, we used a random-effects model. In this meta-analysis, 391 patients with SCLC were identified, and the data were pooled from nine observational studies and followed for 11.4 to 25.0 months. A high ctDNA was associated with worse overall survival (OS, risk ratio [RR] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.85 to 3.38, p < 0.001; I
Indexed as
Identifiers
37027065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.