ArticleArchives of microbiology2023
Probiotic profiling of bifidobacteria indigenous to the human intestinal mucosa shows alleviation of dysbiosis-associated pathogen biofilms.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative microbiome profiling of betel quid chewers and non-chewers to identify dysbiotic microbial signatures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genomic and Phenotypic Insight into the Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacterial spp. Associated with the Human Gut Mucosa.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to isolate bifidobacterial probiotics and characterize the biodiversity of mucosal bacteria in the human distal gut through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Bifidobacterial strains obtained by selective culturing were investigated for biofilms and probiotic characteristics. Both culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches revealed substantial microbial diversity. Bifidobacterium strains yielded robust biofilms with predominantly exopolysaccharides and eDNA matrix. Microscopy revealed species-dependent spatial arrangement of microcolonies. Following probiotic profiling and safety assessment, the inter- and intra-specific interactions in in dual strain bifidobacterial biofilms were studied. As a species, only strains of B. bifidum exhibited exclusively inductive type of interactions whereas in other species, the interactions were more varied. On the other hand, in dual species biofilms, a preponderance of inductive interactions was evident between B. adolescentis, B. thermophilum, B. bifidum, and B. longum. The strong biofilm-formers also diminished pathogenic biofilm viability, and some were proficient in cholesterol removal in vitro. None of the strains exhibited harmful enzymatic activities associated with disease pathology. Interaction between biofilm-forming bifidobacterial strains provides an understanding of their functionality and persistence in the human host, and food or medicine. Their anti-pathogenic activity represents a therapeutic strategy against drug-resistant pathogenic biofilms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37027059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.