ArticleUrolithiasis2023
Finding the optimal candidate for shock wave lithotripsy: external validation and comparison of five prediction models.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Soft-tissue and half-value windows outperform bone window in ureteral stone size measurements in non-enhanced computed tomography.Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2026Article
- Impact of the Mayo adhesive probability score on ESWL outcomes for proximal ureteral stones.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Advancing decision-making in shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones: the role of radiological stone impaction markers.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- A nomogram clinical prediction model for predicting urinary infection stones: development and validation in a retrospective study.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to externally validate five previously published predictive models (Ng score, Triple D score, S
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.