ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
A Hybrid System for Automatic Identification of Corneal Layers on In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- An explainable unsupervised learning approach for anomaly detection on cornealFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Artificial-Intelligence-Enhanced Analysis of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Corneal Diseases: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Deep learning for detection of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy from widefield specular microscopy imaging: a pilot study.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Article
- AI-Based Decision-Support System for Diagnosing Acanthamoeba Keratitis Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate identification of corneal layers with in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) is essential for the correct assessment of corneal lesions. This project aims to obtain a reliable automated identification of corneal layers from IVCM images. Methods: A total of 7957 IVCM images were included for model training and testing. Scanning depth information and pixel information of IVCM images were used to build the classification system. Firstly, two base classifiers based on convolutional neural networks and K-nearest neighbors were constructed. Second, two hybrid strategies, namely weighted voting method and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) algorithm were used to fuse the results from the two base classifiers and obtain the final classification. Finally, the confidence of prediction results was stratified to help find out model errors. Results: Both two hybrid systems outperformed the two base classifiers. The weighted area under the curve, weighted precision, weighted recall, and weighted F1 score were 0.9841, 0.9096, 0.9145, and 0.9111 for weighted voting hybrid system, and were 0.9794, 0.9039, 0.9055, and 0.9034 for the light gradient boosting machine stacking hybrid system, respectively. More than one-half of the misclassified samples were found using the confidence stratification method. Conclusions: The proposed hybrid approach could effectively integrate the scanning depth and pixel information of IVCM images, allowing for the accurate identification of corneal layers for grossly normal IVCM images. The confidence stratification approach was useful to find out misclassification of the system. Translational Relevance: The proposed hybrid approach lays important groundwork for the automatic identification of the corneal layer for IVCM images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.