Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37026269›Full record

GuidelineIndian journal of ophthalmology2023

Management of corneal perforations in dry eye disease: Preferred practice pattern guidelines.

Anahita Kate, Rashmi Deshmukh, Pragnya R Donthineni, Namrata Sharma, Rasik B Vajpayee, Sayan Basu

Open access · diamondAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anahita KateShantilal Sanghvi Cornea Institute, KVC Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Rashmi DeshmukhShantilal Sanghvi Cornea Institute, KAR Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Pragnya R DonthineniShantilal Sanghvi Cornea Institute, KAR Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Namrata SharmaR P Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rasik B VajpayeeVision Eye Institute; Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sayan BasuShantilal Sanghvi Cornea Institute, KAR Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INVision Eye Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal perforations in eyes with dry eye disease (DED) are difficult to manage due to the interplay of several factors such as the unstable tear film, surface inflammation, and the underlying systemic disease affecting the wound healing process, and the eventual outcome. A careful preoperative examination is required to identify the underlying pathology, and status of ocular surface and adnexa, rule out microbial keratitis, and order appropriate systemic workup in addition to assessing the perforation itself. Several surgical options are available, which include tissue adhesives, multilayered amniotic membrane grafting (AMT), tenon patch graft (TPG), corneal patch graft (CPG), and penetrating keratoplasty (PK). The choice of procedure depends upon the size, location, and configuration of the perforation. In eyes with smaller perforations, tissue adhesives are effective treatment modalities, whereas AMT, TPG, and CPG are viable options in moderate-sized perforations. AMT and TPG are also preferable in cases where the placement of a bandage contact lens may be a challenge. Large perforations require a PK, with additional procedures such as tarsorrhaphy to protect the eyes from the associated epithelial healing issues. Conjunctival flaps are considered in eyes with poor visual potential. The management of the acute condition is carried out in conjunction with measures to improve the tear volume bearing in mind the chances of delayed epithelialization and re-perforation in these cases. Administration of topical and systemic immunosuppression, when indicated, helps improve the outcome. This review aims to facilitate clinicians in instituting a synchronized multifaceted therapy for the successful management of corneal perforations in the setting of DED.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesCorneal PerforationDry Eye SyndromesKeratitisTissue AdhesivesHumansKeratoplasty, PenetratingTissue AdhesivesAqueous deficientcorneal perforationdry eye disease

Identifiers

PMID37026269
PMCPMC10276684
OpenAlexW4362692124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.