Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37026250›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2023

Tear biomarkers in dry eye disease: Progress in the last decade.

Nimisha R Kumar, Machiraju Praveen, Raghav Narasimhan, Pooja Khamar, Sharon D'Souza, Abhijit Sinha-Roy, Swaminathan Sethu, Rohit Shetty, Arkasubhra Ghosh

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
26.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Tear fluid database: a reference website for tear fluid proteomics.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nimisha R KumarGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Machiraju PraveenGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Raghav NarasimhanIBMS Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pooja KhamarDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sharon D'SouzaDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Abhijit Sinha-RoyIBMS Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Swaminathan SethuGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Rohit ShettyDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Arkasubhra GhoshGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Narayana Nethralaya · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is a commonly occurring, multifactorial disease characterized by reduced tear film stability and hyperosmolarity at the ocular surface, leading to discomfort and visual compromise. DED is driven by chronic inflammation and its pathogenesis involves multiple ocular surface structures such as the cornea, conjunctiva, lacrimal glands, and meibomian glands. The tear film secretion and its composition are regulated by the ocular surface in orchestration with the environment and bodily cues. Thus, any dysregulation in ocular surface homeostasis causes an increase in tear break-up time (TBUT), osmolarity changes, and reduction in tear film volume, all of which are indicators of DED. Tear film abnormalities are perpetuated by underlying inflammatory signaling and secretion of inflammatory factors, leading to the recruitment of immune cells and clinical pathology. Tear-soluble factors such as cytokines and chemokines are the best surrogate markers of disease severity and can also drive the altered profile of ocular surface cells contributing to the disease. Soluble factors can thus help in disease classification and planning treatment strategies. Our analysis suggests increased levels of cytokines namely interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-9, IL-12, IL-17A, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α); chemokines (CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CXCL8); MMP-9, FGF, VEGF-A; soluble receptors (sICAM-1, sTNFR1), neurotrophic factors (NGF, substance P, serotonin) and IL1RA and reduced levels of IL-7, IL-17F, CXCL1, CXCL10, EGF and lactoferrin in DED. Due to the non-invasive sample collection and ease of quantitively measuring soluble factors, tears are one of the best-studied biological samples to molecularly stratify DED patients and monitor their response to therapy. In this review, we evaluate and summarize the soluble factors profiles in DED patients from the studies conducted over the past decade and across various patient groups and etiologies. The use of biomarker testing in clinical settings will aid in the advancement of personalized medicine and represents the next step in managing DED.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesLacrimal ApparatusBiomarkersChemokinesCytokinesHumansTearsBiomarkersChemokinesCytokinesBiomarkerchemokinescytokinesdry eye diseasegrowth factorstear-soluble factors

Identifiers

PMID37026250
PMCPMC10276712
OpenAlexW4362692290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.