ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2023
Keratoprosthesis in dry eye disease.
Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progressive Insights into 3D Bioprinting for Corneal Tissue Restoration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- L-carnitine partially restores adherens junction integrity and promotes wound healing in human corneal epithelial cells exposed to hyperosmolar stress.Experimental eye research · 2025Article
- Advancements in keratoplasty: Exploring newer techniques and imaging modalities for enhanced surgical outcomes.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bilateral corneal blindness with severe dry eye disease (DED), total limbal stem cell deficiency with underlying corneal stromal scarring and vascularization, combined with adnexal complications secondary to chronic cicatrizing conjunctivitis is a highly complex situation to treat. In such eyes, procedures such as penetrating keratoplasty alone or combined with limbal stem cell transplantation are doomed to fail. In these eyes, keratoprosthesis (Kpro) or an artificial cornea is the most viable option, eliminating corneal blindness even in eyes with autoimmune disorders such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid, Sjogren's syndrome, and nonautoimmune disorders such as chemical/thermal ocular burns, all of which are complex pathologies. Performing a Kpro in these eyes also eliminates the need for systemic immunosuppression and may provide relatively early visual recovery. In such eyes, the donor cornea around the central cylinder of the Kpro needs to be covered with a second layer of protection to avoid desiccation and progressive stromal melt of the underlying cornea, which is a common complication in eyes with severe DED. In this review, we will focus on Kpro designs that have been developed to survive in eyes with the hostile environment of severe DED. Their outcomes in such eyes will be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.