Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37026242›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2023

A brief account on ocular graft versus host disease.

Debapriya Chatterjee

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Ocular graft versus host disease.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Debapriya ChatterjeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Sidhra, Jammu, India.
Creative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of ocular graft versus host disease (oGVHD) is rising due to the increasing numbers of bone marrow transplantations for various hematologic malignancies and non-malignant indications. The ophthalmic aspect of graft versus host disease (GVHD) still requires much understanding. We carried out a PubMed search of all articles using the terms "oGVHD," "dry eye + hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)," "acute GVHD," and "Chronic GVHD." The review mainly focuses on the existing lacunae in terms of diagnostic criteria. Diagnosis of ocular involvement in GVHD follows the criteria described by the National Institute of Health Consensus Conference (NIH CC) or International Chronic oGVHD (ICCGCHD) consensus group. The severity grading of oGVHD is by Jab's or Robinson's grading for conjunctival involvement. NIH CC and ICCGVHD remain the most commonly used scoring systems. Management of ocular involvement during acute GVHD remains challenging, whereas chronic oGVHD in its milder forms mainly manifests as dry eye disease and is treated accordingly. Multiple unanswered questions remain regarding this entity's pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, and clinical features. Large-scale prospective studies involving oncologists and ophthalmologists must answer questions and formulate guidelines.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationChronic DiseaseConjunctivaHumansProspective StudiesDiagnostic criteriadry eyeGraft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Identifiers

PMID37026242
PMCPMC10276667
OpenAlexW4362692567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.