Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37026194›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of African medicine

Peritoneal adhesion findings during laparoscopy: Determinants of occurrence and effect of severity on operative outcomes in a Nigerian Hospital.

John Osaigbovoh Imaralu, Franklin Inyang Ani, Ekundayo Oluwole Ayegbusi, Florence Adebisi Oguntade, Chimaobi Chukwuemeka Nwankpa, Bukunmi Deborah Olaleye

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of African medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John Osaigbovoh ImaraluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria.
Franklin Inyang AniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria.
Ekundayo Oluwole AyegbusiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Florence Adebisi OguntadeDepartment of Anaesthesia, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria.
Chimaobi Chukwuemeka NwankpaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria.
Bukunmi Deborah OlaleyeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria.
Babcock University · NGObafemi Awolowo University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Peritoneal adhesions unlike other immediately recognizable complications of the surgery may produce long-term consequences, which include infertility and intestinal obstruction. Aims: The study aimed to determine the prevalence, the determinants, and the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery associated with intraperitoneal adhesion findings. Settings and Design: This was a retrospective observational study. Materials and Methods: The study included all laparoscopic gynecological surgeries done between January 2017 and December 2021. Adhesion severity was graded, using the peritoneal adhesion index (PAI), by Coccolini et al. Statistical Analysis: The data were analyzed using the SPSS version 21.0. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with adhesion finding during laparoscopy. Results: There were 158 laparoscopic surgeries with 26.6% prevalence of peritoneal adhesions. The prevalence of adhesions among women with previous surgery was 72.7%. Previous peritoneal surgery was a significant determinant of occurrence of adhesions (odds ratio = 8.291, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.464-15.397, P < 0.001), and such patients had significantly (P = 0.025, 95% CI = 0.408-5.704) more severe adhesions (PAI = 11.16 ± 3.94) than those without prior surgery (PAI = 8.10 ± 3.14). Abdominal myomectomy (PAI = 13.09 ± 2.95) was the most important primary surgical determinant of adhesion formation. There was no significant relationship between adhesion occurrence and conversion to laparotomy (P = 0.121) or mean duration of surgery (P = 0.962). Greater adhesion severity was, however, observed in individuals with operative blood loss <100 ml (PAI = 11.73 ± 3.56, P = 0.003) and those hospitalized for ≤2 days (PAI = 11.12 ± 3.81, P = 0.022). Conclusion: The prevalence of postoperative adhesions during laparoscopy in our center is comparable to what has been earlier reported. Abdominal myomectomy is associated with the greatest risk and severity of adhesions. Laparoscopy in patients with more severe adhesions resulted in less blood loss and shorter duration of hospitalization, suggesting an association of better outcomes with a cautious approach to adhesions.

Indexed as

Intestinal ObstructionLaparoscopyFemaleHospitalsHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTissue AdhesionsFertilitylaparoscopymyomectomyperitoneal adhesions

Identifiers

PMID37026194
PMCPMC10262859
OpenAlexW4362498023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.