Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37026154›Full record

ReviewChemical and biological technologies in agriculture2023

Biotic and abiotic effects of soil organic matter on the phytoavailable phosphorus in soils: a review.

Keiji Jindo, Yuki Audette, Fabio Lopez Olivares, Luciano Pasqualoto Canellas, D Scott Smith, R Paul Voroney

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Keiji JindoAgrosystems Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, 6700AA The Netherlands.
Yuki AudetteSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada.
Fabio Lopez OlivaresLaboratório de Biologia Celular e Tecidual & Núcleo de Desenvolvimento de Insumos Biológicos para Agricultura, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, 28013-602 Brazil.
Luciano Pasqualoto CanellasLaboratório de Biologia Celular e Tecidual & Núcleo de Desenvolvimento de Insumos Biológicos para Agricultura, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, 28013-602 Brazil.
D Scott SmithDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5 Canada.
R Paul VoroneySchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada.
State University of Norte Fluminense · BRUniversity of Guelph · CACentre for BioSystems Genomics · NLWilfrid Laurier University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil organic matter (SOM) has a critical role in regulating soil phosphorus (P) dynamics and producing phytoavailable P. However, soil P dynamics are often explained mainly by the effects of soil pH, clay contents, and elemental compositions, such as calcium, iron, and aluminum. Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms of how SOM influences phytoavailable P in soils is required for establishing effective agricultural management for soil health and enhancement of soil fertility, especially P-use efficiency. In this review, the following abiotic and biotic mechanisms are discussed; (1) competitive sorption between SOM with P for positively charged adsorption sites of clays and metal oxides (abiotic reaction), (2) competitive complexations between SOM with P for cations (abiotic reaction), (3) competitive complexations between incorporation of P by binary complexations of SOM and bridging cations with the formation of stable P minerals (abiotic reaction), (4) enhanced activities of enzymes, which affects soil P dynamics (biotic reaction), (5) mineralization/immobilization of P during the decay of SOM (biotic reaction), and (6) solubilization of inorganic P mediated by organic acids released by microbes (biotic reaction). Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

EnzymeMetal complexation/dissolutionMineralizationOrganic matterPhosphorusPhytoavailable PP solubilizing microorganismsSorption/desorptionTernary complex

Identifiers

PMID37026154
PMCPMC10069009
OpenAlexW4361218651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.