Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37026049›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2023

The dilemma of new psychoactive substances: A growing threat.

Hawraa Sameer Sajwani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. New psychoactive substances: a multidisciplinary review of challenges and their diverse character.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid Screening of New Psychoactive Substances Using pDART-QqQ-MS.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hawraa Sameer SajwaniMBBCh, MRCPsych, CMQ, MSc Addiction Studies - King's College London, Virginia Commonwealth University and the University of Adelaide. ISAM. Addiction Psychiatry Fellowship - University of California, Los Angeles. Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Fellowship - University of Toronto. GCSRT, Harvard Medical School. Consultant Addiction Psychiatrist, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New psychoactive substances (NPS) pose a major public threat and are a growing problem worldwide. They were designed to replace banned or controlled drugs while escaping quality control measures. Their chemical structure is constantly changed which imposes a major forensic challenge, and makes it difficult for law enforcement measures to track and ban them. Hence, they are called "legal highs" as they replicate illicit drugs whilst remaining legal. Low cost, easy accessibility and less legal liability are the main factors that contribute to the popularity of NPS among the public. This is particularly with the lack of knowledge of the health risks and harms associated with NPS not only amongst the public, but healthcare professionals as well, which further constitutes a challenge for preventative and treatment measures. Further medico-legal investigation, extensive laboratory and non-laboratory analyses, and advanced forensic measures are necessary to identify, schedule and control new psychoactive substances. Besides, additional efforts are required to educate the public and increase their awareness regarding NPS and their potential harms.

Indexed as

Designer drugsDissociative drugsForensicsHallucinogenic drugsHealth risksLaw enforcementLegal highsNew psychoactive substancesPublic awarenessSedative-hypnotic drugsStimulantsSynthetic cannabinoids

Identifiers

PMID37026049
PMCPMC10071313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.