Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025947›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2023

Five-Year Incidence of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Associated Risk Factors in a Nationwide Cohort of 201 945 Danish Patients with Diabetes.

Sebastian Dinesen, Lonny Stokholm, Yousif Subhi, Tunde Peto, Thiusius Rajeeth Savarimuthu, Nis Andersen, Jens Andresen, Toke Bek, Javad Hajari, Steffen Heegaard and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Semaglutide and diabetic retinopathy: an OHDSI network study.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025 · on this map
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian DinesenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lonny StokholmOpen Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Yousif SubhiDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Tunde PetoCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Thiusius Rajeeth SavarimuthuThe Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Nis AndersenOrganization of Danish Practicing Ophthalmologists, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens AndresenOrganization of Danish Practicing Ophthalmologists, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Toke BekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Javad HajariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Steffen HeegaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Kurt HøjlundDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Caroline Schmidt LaugesenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark.
Ryo KawasakiDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Sören MöllerDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Katja SchielkeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anne Suhr ThykjærDepartment of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Frederik PedersenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jakob GrauslundDepartment of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DKRigshospitalet · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKQueen's University Belfast · GBZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) progression rates and identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who later developed PDR compared with patients who did not progress to that state. Design: A national 5-year register-based cohort study including 201 945 patients with diabetes. Subjects: Patients with diabetes who had attended the Danish national screening program (2013-2018) for diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: We used the first screening episode as the index date and included both eyes of patients with and without subsequent progression of PDR. Data were linked with various national health registries to investigate relevant clinical and demographic parameters. The International Clinical Retinopathy Disease Scale was used to classify DR, with no DR as level 0, mild DR as level 1, moderate DR as level 2, severe DR as level 3, and PDR as level 4. Main Outcome Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) for incident PDR for all relevant demographic and clinical parameters and 1-, 3-, and 5-year incidence rates of PDR according to baseline DR level. Results: Progression to PDR within 5 years was identified in 2384 eyes of 1780 patients. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy progression rates from baseline DR level 3 at 1, 3 and 5 years were 3.6%, 10.9%, and 14.7%, respectively. The median number of visits was 3 (interquartile range, 1-4). Progression to PDR was predicted in a multivariable model by duration of diabetes (HR, 4.66 per 10 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.05-5.37), type 1 diabetes (HR, 9.61; 95% CI, 8.01-11.53), a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of > 0 (score 1: HR, 4.62; 95% CI, 4.14-5.15; score 2: HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.74; score ≥ 3: HR, 4.28; 95% CI, 3.54-5.17), use of insulin (HR, 5.33; 95% CI, 4.49-6.33), and use of antihypertensive medications (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.90-2.61). Conclusions: In a 5-year longitudinal study of an entire screening nation, we found increased risk of PDR with increasing baseline DR levels, longer duration of diabetes, type 1 diabetes, systemic comorbidity, use of insulin, and blood pressure-lowering medications. Most interestingly, we found lower risk of progression from DR level 3 to PDR compared with that in previous studies. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyProliferative diabetic retinopathyrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID37025947
PMCPMC10070897
OpenAlexW4321793187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.