Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025832›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Social cognitive theory-based health promotion in primary care practice: A scoping review.

Kazi Faria Islam, Abdul Awal, Hoimonty Mazumder, Ummi Rukaiya Munni, Koushik Majumder, Kohinoor Afroz, Mustari Nailah Tabassum, M Mahbub Hossain

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
65.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kazi Faria IslamResearch Initiative for Health Equity (RiHE), Khulna 9000, Bangladesh.
Abdul AwalResearch Initiative for Health Equity (RiHE), Khulna 9000, Bangladesh.
Hoimonty MazumderResearch Initiative for Health Equity (RiHE), Khulna 9000, Bangladesh.
Ummi Rukaiya MunniKhulna Medical College, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Koushik MajumderChittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
Kohinoor AfrozSir Salimullah Medical College, Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mustari Nailah TabassumChittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
M Mahbub HossainResearch Initiative for Health Equity (RiHE), Khulna 9000, Bangladesh.
Child Health Research Foundation · BDChittagong Medical College · BDKhulna Medical College · BDMitford Hospital, Dhaka

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Using a theoretical perspective to guide research design and implementation can result in a coherent preventative intervention model. Among theoretical frameworks, Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) is particularly useful for studies focused on behavior change in health promotion research. Objective: This scoping review explored and summarized the current evidence on health promotion interventions that integrated constructs of Social Cognitive Theory and the outcome of those interventions in primary care settings. Method: ology: We conducted this scoping review using the PRISMA scoping review guidelines; we reviewed articles from five electronic databases and additional sources that were peer-reviewed journal articles reporting interventions applying SCT constructs and synthesized the outcomes following the interventions. Results: Among 849 retrieved from multiple sources, 39 articles met our eligibility criteria. Most studies (n = 19) were conducted in the United States. Twenty-six studies followed a randomized control trial design. Most studies (n = 26) recruited participants utilizing the primary care network. All 39 studies mentioned "self-efficacy" as the most utilized construct of SCT to determine how behavior change operates, followed by "observational learning" through role models. Twenty-three studies integrated individual (face-to-face) or peered group-based counseling-training programs; eight interventions used telephonic health coaching by a specialist; eight studies used audio-visual mediums. All included studies reported positive health outcomes following the intervention, including increased self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, increased Knowledge of dietary intake, high-risk behaviors such as STIs transmission, adapting to a healthy lifestyle, and adherence to post-transplant medication. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that SCT-based interventions positively impact health outcomes and intervention effectiveness. The results of this study indicate the importance of incorporating and assessing several conceptual structures of behavioral theories when planning any primary care health promotion practice.

Indexed as

Behavior outcomeHealth promotionPrimary health careSelf efficacySocial cognitive theory

Identifiers

PMID37025832
PMCPMC10070720
OpenAlexW4361224323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.