Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025809›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Comparative analysis between Open Field and Elevated Plus Maze tests as a method for evaluating anxiety-like behavior in mice.

Mariah Mesquita de Figueiredo Cerqueira, Micaele Maria Lopes Castro, Amanda Almeida Vieira, Juliana Ayumi Azevedo Kurosawa, Fabio Leite do Amaral Junior, Fabíola de Carvalho Chaves de Siqueira Mendes, Marcia Consentino Kronka Sosthenes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anxiolytic-Like Effect ofACS omega · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of a formulation based onJournal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariah Mesquita de Figueiredo CerqueiraLaboratório de Investigações em Neurodegeneração e Infecção, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém/PA, Brazil.
Micaele Maria Lopes CastroLaboratório de Investigações em Neurodegeneração e Infecção, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém/PA, Brazil.
Amanda Almeida VieiraCurso de Medicina, Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, Belém/PA, Brazil.
Juliana Ayumi Azevedo KurosawaCurso de Medicina, Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, Belém/PA, Brazil.
Fabio Leite do Amaral JuniorLaboratório de Investigações em Neurodegeneração e Infecção, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém/PA, Brazil.
Fabíola de Carvalho Chaves de Siqueira MendesLaboratório de Investigações em Neurodegeneração e Infecção, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém/PA, Brazil.
Marcia Consentino Kronka SosthenesLaboratório de Investigações em Neurodegeneração e Infecção, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém/PA, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety is being increasingly diagnosed in the elderly population. In this sense, epidemiologic data have linked late-life anxiety disorders to increased cognitive decline, morbidity, and even mortality. In addition, studies have already reported the influence of the environment on the association between aging and anxiety. Therefore, the present study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis between Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) and Open Field (OF) tests as methods for evaluating mice's anxiety-like behavior, considering environmental and age variables. For this, eighty Female albino Swiss mice aged 6, 12, and 18 months were housed in an impoverished environment (IE) and enriched environment (EE). Following this, the animals were tested in EPM and OF tests. The environment and age affect the anxiety-like behavior of the mice in the OF, with a difference between the animals of 6 and 18 months, only in the EE (p < 0.021). However, in the EPM, it does not occur. Despite that, the environment affected the distance traveled by the mice in the EPM, where the IE animals showed greater exploratory activity than the EE, only in the 18-month group (p < 0.001). No environmental influences were detected in the OF. Concerning age, in the EPM, animals in the 18-month-old group traveled shorter distances compared to the 6-month group (p < 0.001) and the 12-month group (p < 0.001), only in EE. In turn, in the OF there was a decrease in the distance traveled in the 18-month group compared to the 6-month group (p = 0.012), only in the IE. Thus, the divergences between the results of EPM and OF instigate a better evaluation of the parameters analyzed in each test.

Indexed as

AgingElevated plus mazeEnriched environmentOpen field

Identifiers

PMID37025809
PMCPMC10070366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.