ArticleCureus2023
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome Status Post Anoxic Brain Injury: A Case Presentation of Heightened Susceptibility in the Brain Injury Population.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), a potentially life-threatening neurological emergency characterized by muscle rigidity, altered mental status (AMS), autonomic instability, and hyperthermia, is most commonly precipitated by high-potency first-generation antipsychotics due to central dopamine receptor blockade. There is a heightened risk of NMS in animals with ischemic brain injury (IBI) or traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to the resulting death of dopaminergic neurons from injury and the dopamine receptor blockade elicited upon recovery. To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first documented case of a critically ill patient, with a history of prior exposure to antipsychotics, who suffered an anoxic brain injury with subsequent development of NMS after the initiation of haloperidol for the treatment of acute agitation. Further investigation is necessary to expand upon the existing literature suggesting the role of alternative agents, including amantadine, due to its impact on dopaminergic transmission, as well as dopamine and glutamine release. Furthermore, NMS can be difficult to diagnose due to variable clinical presentation and lack of absolute diagnostic criteria, which is further compounded with central nervous system (CNS) injury, where neurological abnormalities and AMS may be attributed to the injury, rather than a medication effect, especially in the early period. This case highlights the significance of prompt recognition with appropriate treatment of NMS in vulnerable and susceptible patients suffering from brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.