ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Use of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History questionnaire to detect maximal walking distance equal to or lower than 250 m in patients with lower extremity arterial disease.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to assess the accuracy and optimal threshold of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH) questionnaire in identifying patients with a maximal walking distance (MWD) below or equal to 250 m. Methods: This retrospective study screened 388 consecutive patients with suspected symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). Collected data included the patient's history, resting ankle-brachial index, WIQ, and WELCH. MWD was assessed with a treadmill test at 2 mph (3.2 km/h) with a 10% grade. An optimized threshold for detection of MWD ≤ 250 m was determined for each questionnaire Results: The study included 297 patients (63 ± 10 years old). With a threshold of ≤ 64%, the WIQ predicted MWD ≤ 250 m with an accuracy of 71.4% (66.2, 76.5%). With a threshold of ≤ 22, the WELCH predicted a treadmill walking distance of ≤ 250 m with an accuracy of 68.7% (63.4, 74.0%). A new score with only four "yes or no" questions had an accuracy of 71.4% (66.3, 76.6%). Items on this new score consisted of the level of difficulty of walking 1 block, declared maximum walking distance, usual walking speed, and maximum duration of slow walking. Conclusion: A WIQ score ≤ 64% and a WELCH score ≤ 22 help to predict a walking distance of ≤ 250 m in a treadmill test at 2 mph (3.2 km/h) with a 10% grade. A 4-item score could be used for rapid evaluation of walking distance among patients with LEAD, but the validity of this 4-item score requires further confirmation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.