Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025683›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Building a successful minimally invasive mitral valve repair program before introducing the robotic approach: The Massachusetts General Hospital experience.

Antonia van Kampen, Guillaume Goudot, Sophie Butte, Dane C Paneitz, Michael A Borger, Vinay Badhwar, Thoralf M Sundt, Nathaniel B Langer, Serguei Melnitchouk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antonia van KampenDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Guillaume GoudotDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Sophie ButteDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Dane C PaneitzDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Michael A BorgerUniversity Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Vinay BadhwarDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Thoralf M SundtDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Nathaniel B LangerDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Serguei MelnitchoukDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) requiring surgical repair (MVr) are increasingly operated using minimally invasive strategies. Skill acquisition may be facilitated by a dedicated MVr program. We present here our institutional experience in establishing minimally invasive MVr (starting in 2014), laying the foundation to introduce robotic MVr. Methods: We reviewed all patients that had undergone MVr for MVP Results: Between 2013 and 2020, 799 patients were operated for native MVP at our institution, of which 761 (95.2%) received planned MVr (263 [34.6%] via mini-thoracotomy) and 38 (4.8%) received planned MV replacement. With increasing proportions of minimally invasive procedures (2014: 14.8%, 2020: 46.5%), we observed a continuous growth in overall institutional volume of MVP ( Conclusion: A focused approach towards minimally invasive MVr has transformed the overall MVr strategy (incision; repair techniques) at our institution, leading to a growth in MVr volume and improved repair rates without significant complications. On this foundation, robotic MVr was first introduced at our institution in 2021 with excellent outcomes. This emphasizes the importance of building a competent team to perform these challenging operations, especially during the initial learning curve.

Indexed as

minimally invasive cardiac surgeryminimally invasive mitral valve repairmitral valve (MV) repairmitral valve prolapserobotic cardiac surgeryrobotic mitral valve repair

Identifiers

PMID37025683
PMCPMC10070799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.