Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025653›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2023

CURTAINs for your sliding window: Constructing unobserved regions by transforming adjacent intervals.

John Andrew Raine, Samuel Klein, Debajyoti Sengupta, Tobias Golling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reweighting simulated events using machine-learning techniques in the CMS experiment.The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields · 2025
    Article
  2. Robust resonant anomaly detection with NPLM.The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields · 2025
    Article
  3. The interplay of machine learning-based resonant anomaly detection methods.The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John Andrew RaineDépartement de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Samuel KleinDépartement de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Debajyoti SenguptaDépartement de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tobias GollingDépartement de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a new model independent technique for constructing background data templates for use in searches for new physics processes at the LHC. This method, called Curtains, uses invertible neural networks to parameterise the distribution of side band data as a function of the resonant observable. The network learns a transformation to map any data point from its value of the resonant observable to another chosen value. Using Curtains, a template for the background data in the signal window is constructed by mapping the data from the side-bands into the signal region. We perform anomaly detection using the Curtains background template to enhance the sensitivity to new physics in a bump hunt. We demonstrate its performance in a sliding window search across a wide range of mass values. Using the LHC Olympics dataset, we demonstrate that Curtains matches the performance of other leading approaches which aim to improve the sensitivity of bump hunts, can be trained on a much smaller range of the invariant mass, and is fully data driven.

Indexed as

anomaly detectionbump huntinginvertible neural networkmachine learningmodel independentnew physicsparticle physicsunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID37025653
PMCPMC10072325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.