Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025624›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

The microbiome types of colorectal tissue are potentially associated with the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

Yixin Xu, Jing Zhao, Yu Ma, Jia Liu, Yingying Cui, Yuqing Yuan, Chenxi Xiang, Dongshen Ma, Hui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. IntratumoralFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Microbiota relationship between breast, colorectal, and lung cancer types.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Modulating the microbiome as an approach to anticancer drug development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yixin XuDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yu MaDepartment of Pathology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jia LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yingying CuiDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yuqing YuanDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Chenxi XiangDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Dongshen MaDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hui LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the second leading cause of cancer worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Although recent studies have explored prognostic markers in patients with CRC, whether tissue microbes carry prognostic information remains unknown. Here, by assessing the colorectal tissue microbes of 533 CRC patients, we found that Proteobacteria (43.5%), Firmicutes (25.3%), and Actinobacteria (23.0%) dominated the colorectal tissue microbiota, which was different from the gut microbiota. Moreover, two clear clusters were obtained by clustering based on the tissue microbes across all samples. By comparison, the relative abundances of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes in cluster 1 were significantly higher than those in cluster 2; while compared with cluster 1, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria were more abundant in cluster 2. In addition, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratios in cluster 1 were significantly lower than those in cluster 2. Further, compared with cluster 2, patients in cluster 1 had relatively poor survival (Log-rank test,

Indexed as

colorectal cancerpathogenic bacteriaprognostic biomarkerssurvivaltissue microbe

Identifiers

PMID37025624
PMCPMC10072283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.