Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025609›Full record

ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2023

Evaluating the performance of the Roche FEN2 fentanyl immunoassay and its clinical implementation: The role of LDT-based mass spectrometry testing.

Marlen Menlyadiev, Raymond T Suhandynata, Kyle Lund, Michael J Kelner, Robert L Fitzgerald

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marlen MenlyadievDepartment of Pathology, Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health Systems, San Diego, CA, United States.
Raymond T SuhandynataDepartment of Pathology, Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health Systems, San Diego, CA, United States.
Kyle LundDepartment of Pathology, Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health Systems, San Diego, CA, United States.
Michael J KelnerDepartment of Pathology, Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health Systems, San Diego, CA, United States.
Robert L FitzgeraldDepartment of Pathology, Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health Systems, San Diego, CA, United States.
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are widely employed to support the development of FDA-cleared drug immunoassays, their significance in the clinical implementation and evaluation of such assays is often overlooked. This paper reports on the important role of LC-MS/MS LDTs in demonstrating improved performance of the Roche FEN2 fentanyl immunoassay compared with the Thermo DRI fentanyl immunoassay. Methods: The FEN2 assay was implemented according to the manufacturer's instructions and its performance was compared to the existing DRI assay using LC-MS/MS as a reference. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were determined using 250 consecutive random patient specimens. Spiking experiments were conducted to determine cross-reactivity with 31 fentanyl analogs. Select DRI false-positive samples were analyzed by the FEN2 assay via time-of-flight mass spectrometry method (LC-QTOF). Results: The FEN2 assay showed improved clinical sensitivity compared to the DRI (98% vs 61%) in 250 consecutive patient samples due to its ability to detect norfentanyl. It also showed better clinical specificity by correctly classifying select DRI false-positive results. Upon implementation in clinical practice, the FEN2 resulted in a higher screening positivity rate than the DRI (17.3% vs 13.3%) and a greater LC-MS/MS confirmation rate of immunoassay-positive samples (96.8% vs 88.8%, respectively). Conclusion: The use of LC-MS/MS LDTs demonstrated that the FEN2 assay has greater clinical sensitivity and is less prone to false-positives than the DRI assay. These findings support the use of FEN2 in routine clinical practice and emphasize the role of mass spectrometry-based LDTs in clinical toxicology testing.

Indexed as

Clinical sensitivityFEN2FentanylImmunoassayMass spectrometryNorfentanyl

Identifiers

PMID37025609
PMCPMC10070886
OpenAlexW4323670245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.