Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer.

Beatrice Detti, Maria Grazia Carnevale, Sara Lucidi, Luca Burchini, Saverio Caini, Carolina Orsatti, Niccolò Bertini, Manuele Roghi, Vanessa di Cataldo, Simona Fondelli and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Beatrice DettiRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Maria Grazia CarnevaleDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Sara LucidiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Luca BurchiniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Saverio CainiInstitute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network - Istituto per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologia (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.
Carolina OrsattiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Niccolò BertiniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Manuele RoghiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Vanessa di CataldoRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Simona FondelliStruttura Organizzativa Complessa (SOC) Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Gianluca IngrossoRadiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Giulio FrancoliniRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Daniele ScartoniProton Therapy Center-Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Angela SardaroRadiotherapy Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Antonio PisaniRadiotherapy Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Silvia ScocciantiStruttura Organizzativa Complessa (SOC) Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Cynthia AristeiRadiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Lorenzo LiviDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITOspedale Santa Maria Annunziata · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITIstituto per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Biochemical recurrence (BR) occurs in up to 40% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with primary radical prostatectomy (RP). Choline PET/CT may show, in a single-step examination, the site of tumor recurrence earlier than traditional imaging methods, particularly at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, thus influencing subsequent treatment. Methods/patients: Patients with recurrent and non-metastatic prostate cancer (nmPCa), who were assessed with choline PET/CT, were included in the analysis. Based on imaging results, the following therapeutic strategies were chosen: radiotherapy to the prostatic bed, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and chemotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to either the pelvic lymph nodes or distant metastases. We assessed the impact of age, PSA levels, Gleason score (GS), and adjuvant therapy on oncological outcomes. Results: Data from 410 consecutive nmPCa patients with BR who underwent RP as primary treatment were analyzed. One hundred seventy-six (42.9%) patients had a negative choline PET/CT, and 234 (57.1%) patients resulted positive. In the multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy and PSA at recurrence were significant independent prognostic factors on overall survival (OS). In the PET-positive subgroup, the number of relapses, PSA post-prostatectomy, and chemotherapy impacted on OS. PSA (post-surgery and at recurrence) affected progression-free survival (PFS) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, GS, the number of relapse sites, and PSA (post-surgery and at recurrence) were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS). Conclusion: Choline PET/CT provides better accuracy than conventional imaging for the assessment of nmPCa with BR after prostatectomy, thereby enabling salvage strategies and improving quality of life.

Indexed as

[18F]-choline PET/CTbiochemical relapsemetastasis-directed therapyprostate cancerstereotactic ablative radiotherapystereotactic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37025599
PMCPMC10070677
OpenAlexW4328114261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.