Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025578›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2023

Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy, A New Modification of the Original Technique.

Ahmed Setit, Khaled Bela, Ashraf Khater, Islam Elzahaby, Amr Hossam, Emad Hamed

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed SetitDepartment of Surgery, Oncology Center, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0197-8038
Khaled BelaDepartment of Surgery, Oncology Center, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4614-9815
Ashraf KhaterDepartment of Surgery, Oncology Center, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5587-1741
Islam ElzahabyDepartment of Surgery, Oncology Center, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-4451
Amr HossamDepartment of Surgery, Oncology Center, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0251-0536
Emad HamedDepartment of Surgery, Oncology Center, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6779-0797
Mansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although Goldilocks mastectomy offers good aesthetic outcomes. Removal of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) often has a negative psychological impact. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and esthetic outcome of this technique with salvage of the NAC using a dermal pedicle. Materials and Methods: The study included female patients suffering from breast carcinoma with large and or ptotic breast. Patients were offered Goldilocks mastectomy. Those who were unfit for anesthesia, those with locally advanced or metastatic disease or those refusing the procedure were excluded. Results: Fifteen female patients (18 breasts) with a mean age of 51.6 years underwent Goldilocks breast reconstruction with a trial of NAC preservation. The mean body mass index was 39.1 kg/m2. More than half (56%) were cup C, while 44% were cup D. Seven cases (46.7%) showed grade II ptosis and 8 (53.3%) were grade III. The mean operative time was 168 minutes (range 130-240 minutes). NAC ischemic changes were noted in five cases; two (11%) were partial while three (17%) were total. Two cases (11%) suffered from flap loss and one of them was total. No locoregional recurrence or distant metastases were observed. Conclusion: The Goldilocks mastectomy with nipple preservation is an appealing and feasible option for a certain group of patients who have large-sized and/or ptotic breasts. Nevertheless, it is a time-consuming technique with relatively higher rates of flap and NAC complications. Further, studies are required with a larger number of cases and longer follow-up.

Indexed as

breast reconstructionGoldilocks mastectomynipple areola complex

Identifiers

PMID37025578
PMCPMC10071885
OpenAlexW4362585772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.