ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2023
High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma
Article in European journal of breast health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast cancer histopathology, classification and clinical management: Current perspectives.Bioinformation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Tumour regression is defined as continuity of changes leading to the elimination of a neoplastic population and is reflected as periductal fibrosis and intraductal tumour attenuation. The aim of this study was to describe the radiological and clinicopathological characteristics of high-grade breast ductal carcinoma Materials and Methods: Thirty-two cases of high-grade DCIS with RC on biopsy specimens followed by excision were included. The mammographic, ultrasonographic (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of cases were retrospectively reviewed according to the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon. Clinical and histopathological findings [comedonecrosis, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and Ki-67 proliferation index] were recorded. The rate of upgrade to invasive cancer after surgical excision and lymph node involvement were evaluated. Results: The most common mammographic finding was microcalcifications alone (68.8%). The most frequently seen findings on US were microcalcifications only (21.9%), followed by microcalcifications and hypoechoic area (18.7%). On MRI, most lesions presented as clumped non-mass enhancement with segmental distribution. ER/PR negativity (53.1%, 65.6%), HER2 positivity (56.3%) and high Ki-67 (62.5%), which are known to be associated with more aggressive behavior, were found to be proportionally higher. The rate of upgrade to invasive cancer was 21.8%. Conclusion: DCIS with RC lesions present most often as microcalcifications alone on both mammography and US. MRI features are not distinguishable from those of other DCIS lesions. DCIS with RC lesions show biomarker status reflecting more aggressive behavior and high upgrade rate to invasive cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.