Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025523›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2023

Virtual neurosurgery anatomy laboratory: A collaborative and remote education experience in the metaverse.

Nicolas I Gonzalez-Romo, Giancarlo Mignucci-Jiménez, Sahin Hanalioglu, Muhammet Enes Gurses, Siyar Bahadir, Yuan Xu, Grant Koskay, Michael T Lawton, Mark C Preul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Immersive Neurosurgical Anatomy Using Photogrammetry: Technical Note and Scoping Review.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicolas I Gonzalez-RomoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Giancarlo Mignucci-JiménezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Sahin HanaliogluDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Muhammet Enes GursesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Siyar BahadirDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Yuan XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Grant KoskayDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Michael T LawtonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Mark C PreulDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advances in computer sciences, including novel 3-dimensional rendering techniques, have enabled the creation of cloud-based virtual reality (VR) interfaces, making real-time peer-to-peer interaction possible even from remote locations. This study addresses the potential use of this technology for microsurgery anatomy education. Methods: Digital specimens were created using multiple photogrammetry techniques and imported into a virtual simulated neuroanatomy dissection laboratory. A VR educational program using a multiuser virtual anatomy laboratory experience was developed. Internal validation was performed by five multinational neurosurgery visiting scholars testing and assessing the digital VR models. For external validation, 20 neurosurgery residents tested and assessed the same models and virtual space. Results: Each participant responded to 14 statements assessing the virtual models, categorized under realism ( Conclusion: Cloud-based VR interfaces are a novel resource for neurosurgery education. Interactive and remote collaboration between instructors and trainees is possible in virtual environments using volumetric models created with photogrammetry. We believe that this technology could be part of a hybrid anatomy curriculum for neurosurgery education. More studies are needed to assess the educational value of this type of innovative educational resource.

Indexed as

Microsurgical anatomyNeuroanatomyPhotogrammetrySurgical educationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37025523
PMCPMC10070459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.